Activision (ABK)

What IP Should MS/ABK Bring Back?


  • Total voters
    15
Sony don't want COD on PS+ as it will diminish revenue according to latest reports.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Swede
From the lawyer

———

It includes new info about the negotiations between MS and Sony. Some suggestions are obviously wrong now that we know about the provisional approval by the EC. But it's an interesting read about some of the topics that are going to be discussed during the next weeks.


The software giant's 10-year pledge to retain access to Call of Duty to Microsoft's platform competitors, most notably Sony's PlayStation, will likely form the basis of the remedy proposal that Microsoft intends to make to the EC, said one of the sources.

In December, Microsoft President Brad Smith said that it would offer equal access to Call of Duty to Sony, Nintendo and Valve's Steam for a period of 10 years. The ten-year pledge would mean parity on content, features, quality, playability as well as on pricing, said Microsoft Deputy General Counsel Rima Alaily in a statement.

The EC generally market tests remedies with third parties after submission.

Sony, which has been a vocal third party in this review, is likely to voice multiple concerns around the abovementioned remedy, said a third source familiar with the matter. These range from the enforceability of such a complex behavioural remedy to issues around pricing, should Call of Duty be included in Microsoft's GamePass subscription service, this source said.

Microsoft's parity commitment could be very difficult to encode in a contract and enforce, said the third source. As it currently stands, Sony works with Activision from an early date to ensure that its controller is not just responsive, but offers one of the best console player experiences, the source noted.

Another source of concern could stem from the fact that Sony's current contracts with Activision are on terms that are better than parity, noted Joost Rietveld, Associate Professor at University College London's School of Management and a gaming industry specialist. Microsoft disclosed in its CMA filings that under Sony's current exclusivity contract with Activision, Call of Duty would be exclusive to PlayStation for a period of 30 days, while one version of the game was exclusive for a period of one year.

Finally, a key area of dispute may also be around pricing. Sony takes the view that it needs to be enabled to price Call of Duty competitively to what Microsoft could offer, said the third source familiar.

A factor here is the shifts in the industry from console gaming offers, where games can be priced at around EUR 70 for and where the revenue split is typically 30% to the platform and 70% to the publisher, to a subscription service model, said the source.

Under the subscription service model, publishers are typically either paid upfront for the rights to their game, which can be good for smaller gaming studios but less beneficial for blockbuster games like Call of Duty, which would likely see limit to their upside, said Rietveld. Another model for subscriptions is the Spotify-style model where it would be paid for share of time spent on a game, he noted.

A third option would see a licensee, such as Sony, paying the wholesale price for Call of Duty multiplied by the number of users who play the game for more than a set amount of time, he noted.

Sony is likely to take the view that the contract on offer by Microsoft result in diminished revenues for PlayStation, leaving it unable to put investments into its own games, said the third source. It would be forced to offer its PS Plus subscription service at a higher price than GamePass, they noted.

As for Microsoft, it takes the view that the 10-year remedy covers access to Call of Duty on its subscription service PS Play and will offer a 'much better' revenue split that Sony's existing contract with Activision, said the first and a fourth source familiar. It would likely result in hundreds of millions of windfall revenues for SIE, the first source said.

Last week in its remedy notice, the CMA said that Activision/Microsoft did appear to be a suitable case for behavioural remedies, noting that it had been informed of Microsoft's proposed contractual arrangements.

A structural remedy would also be very complicated, noted Rietveld. There are three studios that are working on Call of Duty within Activision, and any carve-out would likely require the development capabilities and not solely the IP for the game, he said. The fourth source familiar with the transaction said that a structural remedy would call into question the deal and would likely prove to be exceptionally complex.
 
Funny coming from Sony..
I wonder how much they, Sony, mashes from Minecraft sales and micro transactions/dlc? It’s not like they’re get all prissy and retaliate by making any of the Minecraft games buggy so they could get it anywhere else…. Wait, didn’t the latest destiny 2 update release with more bugs on Xbox?
 
I don't see why they wouldn't be able to. 30 FPS and 720p would be totally acceptable by Switch standards.
And recently they announced (at an apple event) their bringing warzone 2 to iPhones, I’m assuming to android as well…. They could just port the mobile variant to switch or use its engine to develop it.
 
Basically saying they'll reach their own conclusion.


*edit to add below from the lawyer

It sounds like they won’t be influenced by the EC decision, even if the markets and facts are quite similar.

But I guess that MS could have thought about using the “provisional approval” from the EC as a way to pressure them. However, it doesn’t look that it’s going to work.
 
Last edited: