Grand Dumb Auto XXIIX

You know this is a Joke Topic Right?


  • Total voters
    10
Status
Not open for further replies.
Obviously Microsoft is better than Saudi Arabia or Tencent but if they didn't exist the corporate cheerleading would still be just as high so its a convenient excuse.
I mean, this is the "plastic wars" thread. This is where everybody lets their bias show without judgment.
 
So MS can only become number one by buying up the industry? funny thing for you to admit but it seems to be true based on past performance.

As far as cheerleading the same can be said for many of you (especially you) just in reverse so you don't have a leg to stand on in that kind of debate.

I mean they couldn't compete by buying up individual studios and growing their IPs the traditional way like Sony so they had to open up their wallets more to "compete" which in this case means just adding all of Zenimax and Activision's IPs to their library and call it a day for now 😅
 
Yeah Sony really built Destiny from the ground up.. and Spiderman.

Built Naughty Dog, Insomniac and so on from scratch.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TeKPhaN
#DreamcastForever!!!!!
Sega killed themselves, they were already in a bad financial situation after what happened with the saturn and then EA refusing to support them was the nail in the coffin in the US. I imported my dreamcast from Japan months before it released in the US, same with my N64.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: karmakid
Yeah Sony really built Destiny from the ground up.. and Spiderman.

Built Naughty Dog, Insomniac and so on from scratch.
What an intellectually dishonest argument lol, Destiny is staying multiplatform as are any future Bungie games they said that was part of the deal when they bought the company. The continued crying about spider-man is just idiotic at this point, you know MS could have had that exclusive and they passed on it to focus on their own IP (I don't know which ones) it's not the same Spider-Man series that Activision used to make but you continue to make this fake comparison anyway.

Buying studios is part of natural growth, nobody complained about MS buying up all of those (mostly struggling) studios in 2018/2019 it's buying up publishers and taking multiplatform games and making them exclusive that's the issue. You aren't stupid so I don't know why you continue to pretend you don't see the difference.
 
I mean they couldn't compete by buying up individual studios and growing their IPs the traditional way like Sony so they had to open up their wallets more to "compete" which in this case means just adding all of Zenimax and Activision's IPs to their library and call it a day for now 😅
The irony here is XGS has announced more new IPs. Lol.

I guess by growing IiPs you just mean remaking the old ones for $70 a pop. Lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kvally
You don't know they are going to lose the game completely. By the sounds of it MS will look to bring the series back to Switch which means... more people can actually play it.

Again all Sony are definitely going to lose is exclusive content and advertising.
They told them 3 games after the deal is over, they are planning on taking it away otherwise they wouldn't have said anything. If MS had told them we plan on keeping this series multiplatform going forward and stopped there it would be one thing but saying "three years after our contractual obligations are met" means you are planning on taking it away at that point.
 
Last edited:
What an intellectually dishonest argument lol, Destiny is staying multiplatform as are any future Bungie games they said that was part of the deal when they bought the company. The continued crying about spider-man is just idiotic at this point, you know MS could have had that exclusive and they passed on it to focus on their own IP (I don't know which ones) it's not the same Spider-Man series that Activision used to make but you continue to make this fake comparison anyway.

Buying studios is part of natural growth, nobody complained about MS buying up all of those (mostly struggling) studios in 2018/2019 it's buying up publishers and taking multiplatform games and making them exclusive that's the issue. You aren't stupid so I don't know why you continue to pretend you don't see the difference.
This one talking about dishonest argument when that is all has done. Lol.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: lowdru2k and Kvally
So you just admitted you’re a Sony cheerleader. Tell us something we didn’t know.
You say it every other time you respond to me lol, you say "I've never seen you be critical of sony" and then I point out things I am critical of them on and you respond with the "informative" tag and then a week later you are right back to this childish bulls***.

If you are going to respond do something besides name calling, how about an actual point with something to back it up?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: lowdru2k
You say it every other time you respond to me lol, you say "I've never seen you be critical of sony" and then I point out things I am critical of them on and you respond with the "informative" tag and then a week later you are right back to this childish bulls***.
The irony.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: lowdru2k
The irony here is XGS has announced more new IPs. Lol.

I guess by growing IiPs you just mean remaking the old ones for $70 a pop. Lol.

What new successful IP came from last gen that has rivalled halo, Forza and gears in terms of numbers sold and popularity ?

If Xbox had enough IPs to remake from last gen , they would do so too but they don't lol
 
  • Haha
Reactions: The Wolf King
What new successful IP came from last gen that has rivalled halo, Forza and gears in terms of numbers sold and popularity ?

If Xbox had enough IPs to remake from last gen , they would do so too but they don't lol


MS made it clear BC was more important to them than remakes.
 
What new successful IP came from last gen that has rivalled halo, Forza and gears in terms of numbers sold and popularity ?

If Xbox had enough IPs to remake from last gen , they would do so too but they don't lol
Ignore the factual point and play the "if" game. Lol.
 
What an intellectually dishonest argument lol, Destiny is staying multiplatform as are any future Bungie games they said that was part of the deal when they bought the company. The continued crying about spider-man is just idiotic at this point, you know MS could have had that exclusive and they passed on it to focus on their own IP (I don't know which ones) it's not the same Spider-Man series that Activision used to make but you continue to make this fake comparison anyway.

Buying studios is part of natural growth, nobody complained about MS buying up all of those (mostly struggling) studios in 2018/2019 it's buying up publishers and taking multiplatform games and making them exclusive that's the issue. You aren't stupid so I don't know why you continue to pretend you don't see the difference.


Buying studios is normal... oh but please not Activision as COD could see Sony fall behind Sony in terms of console sales.
 
  • Like
Reactions: menace-uk-
Buying studios is normal... oh but please not Activision as COD could see Sony fall behind Sony in terms of console sales.
A studio and a publisher are two different things, you know better. Most studios don't even own IP, Activision is a publisher with many studios under their umbrella and they own all of the IP.
 
Buying is buying.
A studio and a publisher are two different things, you know better. Most studios don't even own IP, Activision is a publisher with many studios under their umbrella and they own all of the IP.


So how about they just buy the COD IP and studio?
 
A studio and a publisher are two different things, you know better. Most studios don't even own IP, Activision is a publisher with many studios under their umbrella and they own all of the IP.
Not.

Studios are studios.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.