Graphics Discussion/Comparison Thread, v. 2
- Thread starter Andy
- Start date
- Status
Peaking of anisotropic filtering...
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-hands-on-with-rainbow-six-siege
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-hands-on-with-rainbow-six-siege
Your dream has come true, and it is alive and kicking in Forza 6. See below, which is running at less than 10 fps and looks better than anything on the PS4 or PC. But you just wait for excuse A, B or C....incoming in 1, 2, and 3:
Fixed.
Less than 10fps? lol, I don't think so. Probably 30 though.Your dream has come true, and it is alive and kicking in Forza 6. See below, which is running at less than 10 fps and looks better than anything on the PS4 or PC. But you just wait for excuse A, B or C....incoming in 1, 2, and 3:
Fixed.
I was kidding. I was calling it 0 fps cuz it's a static image
That said, I would like to know what game ever made has cars that look better than that. I can't think of any.
I was kidding. I was calling it 0 fps cuz it's a static image
That said, I would like to know what game ever made has cars that look better than that. I can't think of any.
No one judges a games graphics based on that. No one.
Yeah that's right. We only use Uncharted 3's prerendered cutscenes. Wait what?
Ladies and gentlemen, the long awaited graphical face off is finally here.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-tony-hawks-pro-skater-5-face-off
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-tony-hawks-pro-skater-5-face-off
So this is interesting.
The sacrifice here is that it runs at half the frame rate - 30 FPS.
I assume that will be the same on PS4.
The sacrifice here is that it runs at half the frame rate - 30 FPS.
I assume that will be the same on PS4.
Ohhh, that SONY is always passing around the bulls***.
Well he's not wrong there are plenty of games that are 1080P or 60FPS. Also at least its not as bad as the microsoft tweet that was along the lines of "Its outputted in 1080P so why does it matter?".
They both lie so i don't see what the point of nailing one for it whilst ignoring the other.
Has there been a console that has more 1080p/60fps games than the PS4?
Not really seeing a lie here.
Not really seeing a lie here.
And Microsoft was trying to convince people that an upscaled output of 1080P was just as good as an actual 1080P game. I don't see the difference.
Does the locked 60 FPS (without any drops) at 1080p of Wolfenstein: The New Order not count?
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-wolfenstein-new-order-performance-analysis
or Diablo 3 post patch?
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-diablo-3-ultimate-evil-face-off
Do you mean platform exclusive, perhaps?
Last edited:
If you read the entire article the new order is using a scalable dynamic resolution based on the load for both platforms. So not 1080p 100 percent of the time. Most of the time though..,
PDATE 23/5/14 10:05: We've analysed more assets and now believe that a dynamic framebuffer is indeed in effect - on both Xbox One andPlayStation 4 versions. MachineGames does appear to be using the technique used in Rage, where horizontal resolution is scaled according to engine load in order to sustain 60fps. We've added a new shot above, demonstrating a scene where PC runs native 1080p, with both PS4 and Xbox One upscaling in the same area. However, the degree of scaling varies between the consoles, with PS4 holding the advantage and there are clearly scenes where the Microsoft console needs to scale, while PS4 remains at native.
What's it comparing? I see two videos that are on completely different settings. Left one is supersaturated and the contrast is way up as evident from the blown-out highlights. The one on the right the saturation is below normal and the contrast is beyond flat. Is this comparing different PC settings?
- Status