Project Scorpio v4.0

Status
Not open for further replies.
GS isn't going anywhere anytime soon. They still make money. And unlike music CDs or PC gaming, console gamers still need hardware. Even though you can buy the hardware at lots of places, GS is one of the few places that accepts trade ins, and out of all brick and mortar stores it easily has the biggest used game section. Just about every game has a used copy. Rip off prices, yes. But it's still there.

However, just like HMV the shift in products in store is big. When HMV music and movie sales started tanking, suddenly it's all about music books, tshirts, board games, coffee mugs and other junk.

GS has probably shifted one third of their store to cellphones, tablets, and that $20 anime cartoon doll thing that comes in a million variations.

I think the value of GameStop in regards to trade ins is grossly over-valued. Yes there is a market of gamers who rely on trade-in money. If GameStop goes away, there will be other secondary markets that take their place. I'm looking forward to the day that publishers aren't beholden to satisfying retailers. Pricing will be much more flexible and there will be more creative ways for publishers to introduce new IPs once GameStop is gone.
 
Rumors have been light, so I re-dug up this from some random dude. As usual, tech guys please....possible or not, probable or not, etc...?
polishwonder also posted something from this guy (which got spread over to GAF and several other sites), so I'm giving credit where it is due.


"Listen I have absolute 100% inside factual information from a very close acquaintance of mine who has been working with an official Xbox Scorpio dev kit which his development team received from Microsoft back in November 2016. The developer is from a major 1st party studio and the information he has provided me is 100% accurate. The developer confirmed that the 343 industries developer who a few weeks ago publicly stated how the Xbox Scorpio was far more beefier than originally expected was absolutely correct as the console wasn't downgraded at all but rather the exact opposite. The Xbox Scorpio is using a brand new completely custom console only specific architecture that's using an all new rendering method which allows for an ultra efficient almost ZERO LATENCY communication between the system CPU & GPU which allows for a nearly 60% higher graphical rendering performance when compared to what's currently available on Pc graphics cards and or current game consoles. The new architecture essentially allows for the Xbox Scorpio to take 6 teraflops worth of GPU compute power and render that 6 teraflops at 60% higher than the exact same Pc graphics card in a Pc which means that the Xbox Scorpio 6 teraflops of GPU COMPUTE POWER IS EQUIVALENT TO a 9.6 teraflop Pc graphics card. The new custom architecture was developed in collaboration between Microsoft & AMD designed specifically for Xbox Scorpio and the new communication method IS 100% fully patented from Microsoft specifically for the Xbox Scorpio. The way in which Microsoft was able to develop and patent this new custom architecture was because Microsoft funded nearly 40% of the research n development costs associated with ZEN/VEGA in exchange for not jus the ability to develop and patent this brand new custom console only architecture communication method specifically for Xbox Scorpio only but in addition Microsoft also in return was able to secure an extremely cost efficient price on the new Xbox Scorpio chipsets from AMD WHICH ARE ABSOLUTELY 100% ZEN/VEGA based chipsets. The CPU inside the Xbox Scorpio is an 8 CORE RYZEN SUMMIT RIDGE R5 CPU @ 2.8ghz, and the graphics chip inside Xbox Scorpio is a custom designed AMD VEGA GPU 6.2 teraflop GPU @ 970mhz. The Xbox Scorpio is also using 12gb of gddr5x memory with 320gb per second memory bandwidth. Those specs are the exact specs and exact hardware that's currently used inside the Xbox Scorpio dev kits as they are all using early engineering samples of both the RYZEN CPU & VEGA GPU. I was also informed that currently right now developers have numerous games that are currently up and running on the Xbox Scorpio dev kits. The games that I was told so far which are being tested n benchmarked that are currently running NATIVE 4K 60fps on Xbox Scorpio dev kits are as follows.......

DOOM 4K 60fps (Pc ultra equivalent)
BATTLEFIELD 4K 60fps (Pc ultra equivalent)
HALO 5 (4K 60fps Xbox One equivalent)
WITCHER 3 (4K 60fps Pc ultra equivalent)
FALLOUT 4 (4K 60fps Pc ultra equivalent)

Those games are all currently running at NATIVE 4K on the Xbox Scorpio dev kits, and while they're definitely more games being tested n benchmarked internally by different development teams I was told that the ones I listed above are the only games that my sources own personal development team has seen 1st hand running NATIVE 4K 60fps.

I was informed that the reason 343 industries developer came out and publicly expressed the fact that Xbox Scorpio was far beefier than originally expected isn't because the hardware itself is beefier or upgraded but BECAUSE DEVELOPERS HAS ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA THAT MICROSOFT & AMD had developed a brand new custom architecture that's console specific for XBOX SCORPIO which is why so far apparently the system is running NATIVE 4K 60fps at the Pc ultra setting equivalent without even putting the hardware under full load where essentially Xbox Scorpio dev kits are rendering these games at NATIVE 4K 60fps with a lot of wiggle room as the hardware isn't being pushed anywhere near its full capabilities as the new architecture is the biggest jump in graphical rendering power efficiency since the Xbox 360 launched with a custom and Radeon GPU which had the first ever unified memory architecture that wasn't available on Pc graphics cards at the time which is why when Xbox 360 launched there wasn't a Pc graphics card on the market that could compete with Xbox 360 for nearly 18 months until Pc graphics cards started to adopt the new unified graphics architecture at which point that's when Pc caught back up and surpassed consoles. I was told that this time around Pc graphics cards won't be able to adopt this new architecture AS MICROSOFT HAS FULLY PATENTED THIS NEW ARCHITECTURE AS XBOX SCORPIO CONSOLE SPECIFIC which means neither Pc nor PlayStation will be able to use and or develop graphics chipsets using this new architecture as it's fully custom and designed specifically for Xbox Scorpio.

The last thing I wanna share is that at least in the case of my specific source I was told that internally when testing and benchmarking the Xbox Scorpio dev kits the graphical rendering performance is on par with the NVIDIA TITAN X PASCAL in terms of 4K rendering power and that's using an early engineering sample of the RYZEN/VEGA chipset which I was told the final chipset used in Xbox Scorpio will be roughly 15% more power efficient than what's being used in the dev kit as AMD are still tweaking and optimizing the specific APU being used for Xbox Scorpio. I was also informed that in addition to the overall graphics rendering power Xbox Scorpio also has the absolute fastest GAMING CPU in the world right now as the RYZEN CPU IS THE 8 core 8 thread R5 version and it's faster in both single core and multi threaded applications than the intel i7-6900k CPU and while Xbox Scorpio isn't getting the RYZEN r7 CPU which has 8 cores 16 threads I was told it honestly won't make any difference for Xbox Scorpio, however the 8 core 8 thread R5 version is significantly cheaper and vastly more power efficient than the highest end 8 core 16 thread R7 version and that's why Microsoft has chosen to run with the RYZEN R5 version with 8 cores 8 threads ALTHOUGH I WAS TOLD XBOX SCORPIO GAMES WILL NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THE 8 extra virtual cores as those will be locked down and fully reserved specifically to run the system software and all background tasks etc.........

I wanna finally end what I've said by saying the last bit of information which I was told was that with Xbox Scorpio and its new architecture which will enable the 6 teraflops of GPU COMPUTE POWER INSIDE XBOX SCORPIO to be the equivalent of a 9.6 teraflop Pc graphics card but also I was told that because of the nature of development for a closed loop console type environment with an ultra low level console API I was told that the optimization for this console will enable Xbox Scorpio to have a very serious initial advantage over even the most expensive ultra high end gaming computers and because of the patent on the new custom console specific Xbox Scorpio only architecture the developer community pretty much all agree that this initial advantage could hold strong for at least 18 to 24 months and so yea I'm sure ok get all sorts of flack and pissed off Pc master race haters talking s*** about what I've said but TRUST ME GUYS WHAT IVE SAID IS ABSOLUTELY THE REAL DEAL AND APPARENTLY MICROSOFT WILL BE SHARING DETAILS REGARDING THE NEW RYZEN/VEGA APU and also the new custom patented Xbox Scorpio architecture sometime around and or at this years upcoming E3 convention."

Already nonfactual as there no 8 core Ryzen 5 CPU. Ryzen 5 is either 6 or 4 cores.
 
Already nonfactual as there no 8 core Ryzen 5 CPU. Ryzen 5 is either 6 or 4 cores.

Really hoping that an upgraded Witcher 3 happens. Been tempted to go back to the game however held off due to the potential upgraded Scorpio version. I think the Xbox One version looks kinda dull compared to what Pc gamers could enjoy.
 
Really hoping that an upgraded Witcher 3 happens. Been tempted to go back to the game however held off due to the potential upgraded Scorpio version. I think the Xbox One version looks kinda dull compared to what Pc gamers could enjoy.

It would be cool but unless MS is handling it themselves I don't see it happening, CDPR didn't do anything for the PS4 Pro because they said they moved on to Cyberpunk. The game sold substantially better on the PS4, slightly over 3-1 so I would think if they were going to bother with upgrades of an older game they'd have done something for the PS4 Pro as well but they decided not to. It's not a matter of power but resources, the game will be a year and a half old by the time Scorpio comes out. Again I think it would be awesome if they did it, if I buy a scorpio and TW3 does get a substantial graphics upgrade I'll double dip and buy it again but I'm not very hopeful that they'll do it.
 
There seems to be a lot of fan fiction regarding Scorpio but there have been a few consistencies in regards to rumors that kind of make sense when developers say it's more powerful than they expected. They've know about 6TF and bandwidth for awhile.
  • Some variation of Zen. 60 fps and VR won't be major talking points if this thing has a Jaguar.
  • Significant efficiencies - PCs have significantly closed the gap on getting closer to the metal. A 6TF GPU will not be consistently hitting 4K 60fps with high graphical settings on new games unless it performs like something greater than a 6TF GPU.
  • MS invested a lot in R&D frontend therefore won't be dealing with the typical licensing costs when they roll Scorpio into production
Good news is we're only a few months away from knowing the reality.
 
if u look at Ms latest mp offering in halo 5, gears 4 all pushed 60fps with scaling res. I believe this is to keep fps parity with Scorpio.

xb1 and Scorpio will always have same target fps in mp. 4k/60 Scorpio will shall see.
 
I'm not an expert on this so maybe someone else with more PC knowledge can chime in but I've read dozens of times that Nvidia teraflops and AMD teraflops aren't really the same, that AMD is generally less capable than Nvidia when comparing the same TF numbers.
 
I'm not an expert on this so maybe someone else with more PC knowledge can chime in but I've read dozens of times that Nvidia teraflops and AMD teraflops aren't really the same, that AMD is generally less capable than Nvidia when comparing the same TF numbers.
I'm guessing it depends on whether it's AMD or Nvidia talking, lol.
 
I'm not an expert on this so maybe someone else with more PC knowledge can chime in but I've read dozens of times that Nvidia teraflops and AMD teraflops aren't really the same, that AMD is generally less capable than Nvidia when comparing the same TF numbers.

Comparing teraflops is not a great way to determine power. PS3 had nearly twice the stated flops as 360 but 360 was far more efficient and balanced.
 
I'm guessing it depends on whether it's AMD or Nvidia talking, lol.

Haha could be :) I've been reading this for a long time, before either of the console refreshes were even announced. The general feeling from what I've gathered is that Nvidia offers superior performance and that AMD's numbers are either inflated or their products just aren't as efficient.
 
Haha could be :) I've been reading this for a long time, before either of the console refreshes were even announced. The general feeling from what I've gathered is that Nvidia offers superior performance and that AMD's numbers are either inflated or their products just aren't as efficient.
nVidia smokes amd
 
I'm not an expert on this so maybe someone else with more PC knowledge can chime in but I've read dozens of times that Nvidia teraflops and AMD teraflops aren't really the same, that AMD is generally less capable than Nvidia when comparing the same TF numbers.

This is pretty much true.

It really is a result of where these companies diverged in the early to mid 2000s.

AMD was concentrating more of their efforts on the efficiency side of GPU architecture while trying to get their thermal issues sorted while NVIDIA was more about brute force GPU muscle and premium components.

This still holds mostly true today, but more blurred. This is because both companies have products that push the boundaries of what a GPU is capable of but NVIDIA is usually the first to the market with groundbreaking GPU tech. It is the same reason why their Tesla/Quadro GPUS are being used in deep learning and self driving cars as well as all the animation studios that use them.
It is also the reason they charge $3000-$6000+ for just one of them.

General rule though is that just teraflop comparisons by themselves in this day and age isn't going to be a hallmark factor when comparing Nvidia vs AMD. The teraflops can be identical but the mathematical process of how the CUDA cores on an Nvidia GPU use their power and how the Stream Processors on an AMD card do the same is fundamentally different. The comparing GPU architectures being the big difference in FLOP performances.
FLOPS is just a calculation of ([Number of cores] * 2) * [max frequency]. That is the same formula for both AMD and NVIDIA GPUs.
The exact ratio of difference between flops on AMD cards vs Nvidia cards though will never fully be calculated because again, the architectures are so different that a general consensus cannot be reached on one card being X times better during a bilateral comparison of recently released cards for both manufacturers
 
if u look at Ms latest mp offering in halo 5, gears 4 all pushed 60fps with scaling res. I believe this is to keep fps parity with Scorpio.

xb1 and Scorpio will always have same target fps in mp. 4k/60 Scorpio will shall see.

Gears has 60fps because for competitive play as it makes the game that much better. Halo is 60fps all round because one of the major selling points of CoD last gen was its framerate. Battlefield 3 and 4 followed and so now must everything that intends to be a serious player in the fps field. Destiny is probably the only exception but its open world so gets a pass....for now
 
Last edited:
Already nonfactual as there no 8 core Ryzen 5 CPU. Ryzen 5 is either 6 or 4 cores.
it is 2 block each block has 4 core
it is a modified
people seems very hard to grasp the idea of custom designed

same as XOne
at that time there is only 4 core Jag, there is no 8 core Jag
it is then revealed as 2x Block, each block hold 4 core

infact if people follow the concept
soon 1 core means cluster
infact thats what AMD recent paper said
they said 8 core as 2 core
as they meant 1 core = 1 cluster of 4 core
 
Already nonfactual as there no 8 core Ryzen 5 CPU. Ryzen 5 is either 6 or 4 cores.

Although I agree with the opinion that the post was homegrown fertilizer, they could certainly have done a custom chip that is somewhere between R5 and R7 - maybe all the cores of R7 but lower clocks or some such. They certainly could also have sent me a gallon of ice cream a day for the rest of my life.
 
it is 2 block each block has 4 core
it is a modified
people seems very hard to grasp the idea of custom designed

same as XOne
at that time there is only 4 core Jag, there is no 8 core Jag
it is then revealed as 2x Block, each block hold 4 core

infact if people follow the concept
soon 1 core means cluster
infact thats what AMD recent paper said
they said 8 core as 2 core
as they meant 1 core = 1 cluster of 4 core

So what you're trying to say is Scorpio is going to blow everything out of the water? That's what i thought. Can't wait to play the industry's best third party games on the most powerful console of all time!
 
it is 2 block each block has 4 core
it is a modified
people seems very hard to grasp the idea of custom designed

same as XOne
at that time there is only 4 core Jag, there is no 8 core Jag
it is then revealed as 2x Block, each block hold 4 core

infact if people follow the concept
soon 1 core means cluster
infact thats what AMD recent paper said
they said 8 core as 2 core
as they meant 1 core = 1 cluster of 4 core
Color me confused
 
it is 2 block each block has 4 core
it is a modified
people seems very hard to grasp the idea of custom designed

same as XOne
at that time there is only 4 core Jag, there is no 8 core Jag
it is then revealed as 2x Block, each block hold 4 core

infact if people follow the concept
soon 1 core means cluster
infact thats what AMD recent paper said
they said 8 core as 2 core
as they meant 1 core = 1 cluster of 4 core
Who's on first?
 
it is 2 block each block has 4 core
it is a modified
people seems very hard to grasp the idea of custom designed

same as XOne
at that time there is only 4 core Jag, there is no 8 core Jag
it is then revealed as 2x Block, each block hold 4 core

infact if people follow the concept
soon 1 core means cluster
infact thats what AMD recent paper said
they said 8 core as 2 core
as they meant 1 core = 1 cluster of 4 core
Well, I am having a block party and guess who is not invited!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.