Well releasing a year later and at a higher price gives such results.That's not true/faulty logic.
PS2 owned the world, and completely owned NA - by a WIDE margin, especially over Xbox prime... yet Sony lost it, and lost it big time.
Well releasing a year later and at a higher price gives such results.That's not true/faulty logic.
PS2 owned the world, and completely owned NA - by a WIDE margin, especially over Xbox prime... yet Sony lost it, and lost it big time.
Doubt it, is there any Japanese RPGs announced for Xbone?
Even if there were I doubt it'd help, MS went out of their way to really try to cater to the Japanese audience around the launch of the 360 and it didn't help at all.
Well releasing a year later and at a higher price gives such results.
Amazon makes public the amount of stock on hand and sales? LOL.
That's simply false. It's completely accurate. Microsoft released very specific numbers. The numbers are clear, and 100% accurate - Xbox One sold more units per day on average in November.
It's somewhat meaningless though, because it doesn't mean there was more stock, or more demand... But it's a completely accurate stat, and it's not misleading.
This is because the comparison method is flawed. You can't compare two selling rates that don't start and end within the same parameters..
Exactly.Sure you can - you just simplify it.
PS4 was out for 16 days, and sold 1.1 mill... Average of roughly 69k a day.
X1 was out for 9 days, sold .9 mill... Average of roughly 100k a day.
100k is more than 69k.
It's truthful, factual, not misleading, and completely accurate.
Now, again - we all know it doesn't mean much... But you can totally make such claims, and they make perfect sense.
Besides, it's a metric which might actually end up being interesting as time goes on...
Sure you can - you just simplify it.
PS4 was out for 16 days, and sold 1.1 mill... Average of roughly 69k a day.
X1 was out for 9 days, sold .9 mill... Average of roughly 100k a day.
100k is more than 69k.
It's truthful, factual, not misleading, and completely accurate.
Now, again - we all know it doesn't mean much... But you can totally make such claims, and they make perfect sense.
Besides, it's a metric which might actually end up being interesting as time goes on...
So you agree that if Sony launched on the last day of November that it would be far and honest to say it sold ~1 million/day?.
Sure you can - you just simplify it.
PS4 was out for 16 days, and sold 1.1 mill... Average of roughly 69k a day.
X1 was out for 9 days, sold .9 mill... Average of roughly 100k a day.
100k is more than 69k.
It's truthful, factual, not misleading, and completely accurate.
Now, again - we all know it doesn't mean much... But you can totally make such claims, and they make perfect sense.
Besides, it's a metric which might actually end up being interesting as time goes on...
Comparing them without setting the same parameters is like comparing apples to oranges.
It's flawed and doesn't give any meaningful info so when Major Nelson said they were the fastest selling, the sentence is flawed because no such comparison can be made except if the xbox one was compared to itself.
Exactly.Thank goodness they used the same parameters, then; number of days available, number of units sold, and averaged across those days. Identical parameters.
That's false.
Major Nelson stated a fact which is both true, and not misleading. All the numbers were included, and supported his claim.
.9 million / 9 = 100k.
1.1 million / 16 = 69k.
100k is higher than 69k. That means on average, X1 sold more units per day. It's very easy, straight forward math.
...It doesn't mean much, but it's completely valid, completely accurate, and completely easy to prove as such.
.
It's like comparing the run times between someone running a 100 m race and someone running a 200 m race and averaging the time as meters/second and then comparing the two. Just doesn't make sense.
Thank goodness they used the same parameters, then; number of days available, number of units sold, and averaged across those days. Identical parameters.
That's false.
Major Nelson stated a fact which is both true, and not misleading. All the numbers were included, and supported his claim.
.9 million / 9 = 100k.
1.1 million / 16 = 69k.
100k is higher than 69k. That means on average, X1 sold more units per day. It's very easy, straight forward math.
...It doesn't mean much, but it's completely valid, completely accurate, and completely easy to prove as such.
Exactly.
If Sony fans think MS is misleading people, Sony is no different. They said they sold 2.1M consoles on by Dec 1. Hardly a fair comparison as PS4 was launched a week early in NA and then on Nov 29, launched in 30 more countries.
As Sony fans should claim.... not a fair comparison. Sony had a timing and geographical location advantage.
Will be interesting if they put the shoe on the other foot.
Actually, it's not like that. PS4 and X1 are in the same race. It's actually a lot like this - Runner 'A' started a marathon 16 days ago, and ran 1.1 miles in a 100 mile marathon. Runner 'B' started the marathon 9 days ago, and has run .9 miles... Which pace is faster? Who's run further? How much do either numbers matter, being that it's a 100 mile marathon, and we're only 1% through it?
You can look at this in a different light as well. Runner 'A' ran close to 1 mile in 24 hours and was energy depleted, running minimal amounts for the rest of the 15 days. Runner 'B' managed his energy and ran an average of 0.1 mile / day. Who ran the "fastest" here? Runner A who ran close to 1 mile in 24 hours or Runner B who took 9 days to get not even to 1 mile? Is it someone who ran to 1 mile in 24 hours or someone who took 9 days to get to 0.9 mile?
See how I "spun" the situation?
So you see, you can't really make a comparison like I said in regards to "fastest selling".
The bottom line is MS had to say something positive about their launch and since they couldn't claim that they had the best selling machine they had to come up with some way to spin it. I don't mean to say the X1 isn't selling well because it is but it wasn't the best selling console in November and trying to claim some other type of victory is all for PR and pretty much meaningless.
Your comparison fails, because it *still* shows a faster pace for runner "B".
1.1/16 is less than .9/9. It's easy math. Not complex.
Who got to 1 million faster? 24 hours is less than 9 days. Easy math as well.
That's irrelevant to average pace. That shows peak-pace performance, not average pace performance.
Average pace is total sales divided by days on the market. Xbox One wins at that for November.
It's really easy, and trivial to understand.
It's relevant to the "who sold the fastest". It's easy, Sony got to 1 million in 24 hours, Xbox One got to just a bit over 900k in 9 days.
It's only relevant to "who sold the fastest", if you're specifically referring to fastest peak-sales pace.
Xbox One was the fastest selling console (on average) in November.
So there you have it, looks like we've found our common ground.