Who Won E3? (v. 2.0)

Who Won E3?

  • Sony

    Votes: 23 46.0%
  • Microsoft

    Votes: 17 34.0%
  • Nintendo

    Votes: 1 2.0%
  • PC

    Votes: 2 4.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 7 14.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
You just can't handle the truth.
They are going this route because they want that money but this route will have them continue down the road of not being a leader in any area (when it comes to gaming) its basically them throwing the towel in.


P.s quit talking like your challenged .. its just video games
That's one way to look at it...

Another way to look at it is their creating a new playing field, restructuring their foundation, learning from their mistakes and offering something the competition can't match, not to mention having near endless resources to do it. Something else the competition can't say. In fact, they seem poised to to drive the gaming community in a direction many will embrace. That's including Sony fans. They'll still get your money, you'll still buy their games. Can/will Sony follow? Hell no...

Think about it.
 
That's one way to look at it...

Another way to look at it is their creating a new playing field, restructuring their foundation, learning from their mistakes and offering something the competition can't match, not to mention having near endless resources to do it. Something else the competition can't say. In fact, they seem poised to to drive the gaming community in a direction many will embrace. That's including Sony fans. They'll still get your money, you'll still buy their games. Can/will Sony follow? Hell no...

Think about it.
Sony fans don't care and why should they.
Sony is a Leader in gaming as per sales,stellar exclusives and selling the product/vision! did you watch the Sony Press conference? Can't tell me that chit wasn't off the hook!
 
http://gearburn.com/2016/06/microsoft-xbox-won-e3/

Microsoft Xbox won E3 2016 according to social media numbers

By Andy Walker: Gearburn Editor on 16 June, 2016

Microsoft Xbox’s conference received 29% of social mentions during E3 2016, while Sony‘s PlayStation soiree only mustered 13%. According to BrandWatch’s chart (above), Electronic Arts and Ubisoft both enjoyed more mentions than Sony. That’s quite a bitter pill to swallow for Sony fans convinced that PlayStation owned this year’s event.

E3-2016-Conference-Comparison-12-15-June-brandwatch.jpg


It’s not surprising at all that Project Scorpio — the company’s forthcoming 4K console — saw the tallest mention spike. The conference also saw a steep initial mention incline, thanks to its Xbox One S announcement. These two announcements were likely bolstered by previous leaks.

Interestingly, Microsoft’s game announcements didn’t see many marked spikes, with the likes of ReCore, Dead Rising 4 and Sea of Thieves seeing the biggest spikes. But the biggest spike of all went to We Happy Few — a once Kickstarter gamecoming to Xbox platforms.

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild was the most popular game

Even though (subjectively) Nintendo‘s conference was one of the dullest, the new Zelda game — Breath of the Wild — was the most talked about on social media. BrandWatch counted over 73 000 mentions for Nintendo in total, but remarkably Breath received just under 12 000 of those.



Other popular games were Electronic Arts’ Battlefield 1, Sony’s God of War, and surprisingly in fourth, Crash Bandicoot.

So, who actually won E3 2016?
Here’s the big question. Based on the numbers, it’s clear that Microsoft and Nintendo share the spoils, but it’s not that simple.

For one, people may argue that Sony’s announcement took place in the early hours in Europe (3am in South Africa), while Microsoft’s took place at a much more pleasant 6.30pm CET/SAST. This could’ve skewed mentions in Microsoft’s favour. Bethesda’s conference was also scheduled for 3am in South Africa and central Europe, which could explain its relative pale social numbers too.

Also, not too many companies announced new hardware (at least not live on stage), which allowed Microsoft’s console announcements to take the limelight.

Furthermore, social media mentions don’t always indicate positive sentiment, so one shouldn’t really read these numbers as wholly in favour of the company or game receiving the mentions. Humans are a lot more complicated than that.

So, what’s the verdict then? Well, numbers don’t lie, but its also important to be cognisant the content behind these numbers. So that brings us to this: we really want to hear from you. What company do you think won E3 2016? Vote in our poll below.
 
http://gearburn.com/2016/06/microsoft-xbox-won-e3/

Microsoft Xbox won E3 2016 according to social media numbers

By Andy Walker: Gearburn Editor on 16 June, 2016

Microsoft Xbox’s conference received 29% of social mentions during E3 2016, while Sony‘s PlayStation soiree only mustered 13%. According to BrandWatch’s chart (above), Electronic Arts and Ubisoft both enjoyed more mentions than Sony. That’s quite a bitter pill to swallow for Sony fans convinced that PlayStation owned this year’s event.

E3-2016-Conference-Comparison-12-15-June-brandwatch.jpg


It’s not surprising at all that Project Scorpio — the company’s forthcoming 4K console — saw the tallest mention spike. The conference also saw a steep initial mention incline, thanks to its Xbox One S announcement. These two announcements were likely bolstered by previous leaks.

Interestingly, Microsoft’s game announcements didn’t see many marked spikes, with the likes of ReCore, Dead Rising 4 and Sea of Thieves seeing the biggest spikes. But the biggest spike of all went to We Happy Few — a once Kickstarter gamecoming to Xbox platforms.

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild was the most popular game

Even though (subjectively) Nintendo‘s conference was one of the dullest, the new Zelda game — Breath of the Wild — was the most talked about on social media. BrandWatch counted over 73 000 mentions for Nintendo in total, but remarkably Breath received just under 12 000 of those.



Other popular games were Electronic Arts’ Battlefield 1, Sony’s God of War, and surprisingly in fourth, Crash Bandicoot.

So, who actually won E3 2016?
Here’s the big question. Based on the numbers, it’s clear that Microsoft and Nintendo share the spoils, but it’s not that simple.

For one, people may argue that Sony’s announcement took place in the early hours in Europe (3am in South Africa), while Microsoft’s took place at a much more pleasant 6.30pm CET/SAST. This could’ve skewed mentions in Microsoft’s favour. Bethesda’s conference was also scheduled for 3am in South Africa and central Europe, which could explain its relative pale social numbers too.

Also, not too many companies announced new hardware (at least not live on stage), which allowed Microsoft’s console announcements to take the limelight.

Furthermore, social media mentions don’t always indicate positive sentiment, so one shouldn’t really read these numbers as wholly in favour of the company or game receiving the mentions. Humans are a lot more complicated than that.

So, what’s the verdict then? Well, numbers don’t lie, but its also important to be cognisant the content behind these numbers. So that brings us to this: we really want to hear from you. What company do you think won E3 2016? Vote in our poll below.

didn't andy say not to post this type of stuff?
 
didn't andy say not to post this type of stuff?

If you are allowed to post this stuff in the Game of the show thread then it should be allowed in here as well.

Microsoft won E3. Social media proves it. Chart wins is all that matters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kvally
If you are allowed to post this stuff in the Game of the show thread then it should be allowed in here as well.

Microsoft won E3. Social media proves it. Chart wins is all that matters.
I can post polls saying Sony won(and MS is far behind) in fact I don't think a single known gaming site has MS winning and I know this without checking...why? Because it was pretty clear Sony owned E3.
The above same goes for Zelda.
 
I can post polls saying Sony won(and MS is far behind) in fact I don't think a single known gaming site has MS winning and I know this without checking...why? Because it was pretty clear Sony owned E3.
The above same goes for Zelda.

Spin spin spin spin spin. It's like watching a wonky roulette wheel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TeKPhaN
PS4 exclusives review scores are ahead of the Xbox One by a landslide. More than 10 titles and no Xbox One exclusive even reaches a 90 average review score. Sorry Andy
And yet, that means s*** to me. I'll take Halo 5 ten times over Uncharted. I've played through that campaign multiple times not to mention the hours spent in MP. I can't even muster a full second playthrough of Uncharted 4, and I've tried. Its so linear, and the actual play is just mediocre to me, and why Halo is certainly just as linear, the gameplay is so dynamic that it makes each playthrough as fun as the last. Graphics only get you so far. Honestly, the after the flash of the graphics wear off, UC 4 is just sorta... Boring.

So why does it matter? Your incessant adherance to meta scores borders on religious. You can't argue the value of a game if it holds no interest or doesn't live up to the group think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: menace-uk-
And yet, that means s*** to me. I'll take Halo 5 ten times over Uncharted. I've played through that campaign multiple times not to mention the hours spent in MP. I can't even muster a full second playthrough of Uncharted 4, and I've tried. Its so linear, and the actual play is just mediocre to me, and why Halo is certainly just as linear, the gameplay is so dynamic that it makes each playthrough as fun as the last. Graphics only get you so far. Honestly, the after the flash of the graphics wear off, UC 4 is just sorta... Boring.

So why does it matter? Your incessant adherance to meta scores borders on religious. You can't argue the value of a game if it holds no interest or doesn't live up to the group think.

You would think that somebody who loves the s*** out of a game that only got a mid 70 metacore would realize just how unimportant meta scores are.
 
And yet, that means s*** to me. I'll take Halo 5 ten times over Uncharted. I've played through that campaign multiple times not to mention the hours spent in MP. I can't even muster a full second playthrough of Uncharted 4, and I've tried. Its so linear, and the actual play is just mediocre to me, and why Halo is certainly just as linear, the gameplay is so dynamic that it makes each playthrough as fun as the last. Graphics only get you so far. Honestly, the after the flash of the graphics wear off, UC 4 is just sorta... Boring.

So why does it matter? Your incessant adherance to meta scores borders on religious. You can't argue the value of a game if it holds no interest or doesn't live up to the group think.
Xbox One has no high rated exclusives no matter how you spin it and we are going on year THREE.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.