Lol! I feel that guy and Michael Ironside is sitting across the table from me.
Or maybe the games are rough in certain areas and they don't want it to effect their reviews? The latest Killzone video of gameplay wasn't exactly smooth in some spots. Maybe Sony is hiding something worse? A controlled environjment might have only some stages available to play,with the rough ones not. Would effect game scores allot. It almost reminds me of the infamous tactic of shipping a finished but rough game to retail only and not game reviewers,just to evade a bad review. Well sort of.... Still abit shady. LOL.dirty tactic to use controlled events for reviewing the console/games.
manufacturing problems?
Or maybe the games are rough in certain areas and they don't want it to effect their reviews? The latest Killzone wasn't exactly 60 frames in some spots. Maybe Sony is hiding something worse? A controlled environjment might have only some stages available to play,with the rough ones not. Would effect game scoress allot. if true its shady as hell. LOL.
The truth will set you free.I think we all can agree that Sony wants to control reviews on their games for a real reason however. Not cool in my book. The public needs to know the truth. Not Sonys version of the truth.
True.it seems that AG is basically making fun of people that think MS is waiting till the 12 to tell of the game resolutions.
https://twitter.com/aegies
Why would Microsoft hold "bad news" about multiplats until ... 10 days before their system launches?
My fav was thisit seems that AG is basically making fun of people that think MS is waiting till the 12 to tell of the game resolutions.
https://twitter.com/aegies
Why would Microsoft hold "bad news" about multiplats until ... 10 days before their system launches?
Have we bto by Sony? It sure sounds like it. It also sounds like what we've seen of KZ, Knack etc may not be what we actually get when the Ps4 releases. If technically the Ps4 doesnt exist yet, then essentially we've been seeing a lot of fluff until the retail version is out. Not good....not good at all.
Come on mate. You cant tell me you honestly believe this type of behavior is alright from Sony? Why control the content? Why control reviews of the hardware or the software from the public? Thats not cool.....All this doom n gloom on both sides of the pond is frankly stupid. Fanboyys jump upon any negative tweet/ rumor they could spot of the 'other' console to make themselves feel better.
Where has any such thing been confirmed, i dont go by tweets or the rumor mill on gaf.Come on mate. You cant tell me you honestly believe this type of behavior is alright from Sony? Why control the content? Why control reviews of the hardware or the software from the public? Thats not cool.....
'Come on mate. You cant tell me you honestly believe this type of behavior is alright from Sony? Why control the content? Why control reviews of the hardware or the software from the public? Thats not cool.....
'
you do know every company does this right.....
Where has any such thing been confirmed, i dont go by tweets or the rumor mill on gaf.
it did get posted originally on gaf didn't it?This didn't come from GAF. It came from known game reviewers and journalist like Adam Sessler (Rev3 Games) and Marcus Beer (Gametrailers). They are up in arms about it.
'
you do know every company does this right.....
it did get posted originally on gaf didn't it?
no, but there's definitely worse things that publishers do and this doesnt even come close. so getting up in arms about common practice.......and so that makes it okay?
If they have, I've never heard of it, and it wouldn't explain why they are so mad about it. Typically reviewers are sent copies of the game to review at their own pace. And apparently Microsoft has let them play around with the retail Xbox One according to Kevin Dent.
So why not Sony?
I'm not saying anything is wrong with the PS4. But reviewers certainly don't like it because they won't be able to report if there were any massive problems with it before launch