'Battlefield: Hardline. Arriving 2015

It was my favorite & I think it's the best made. It finally wasn't clunky. I was in a knifing clan with 15,000 knives. The knifing was the best in BF3. I also enjoyed every single map on the disc, something I can't say about other Battlefields. Also, they finally did DLC right with the Premium...it was a great package BF3 + Premium.

Anyways, it's free...so stop nit-picking & just get it if you don't have it. lol.
 
I really can't wait to no knock raid some 90 year old woman because she has a marijuana card. I'll flash bang the sh!t out of her cats.
 
Oh gawd, as much as I love BF....it's going the way of CoD.

1. Too soon for another BF game.
2. Fix the current BF first.
 
It just looks like DLC

BF4: cops and robbers

I'm guessing us BF4 premium members will get this free? :p
 
de3d1 said:
It just looks like DLC

BF4: cops and robbers

I'm guessing us BF4 premium members will get this free? :p
Click to expand...


We should after what we've had to put up with for the last 7 months. Here we are, 7 months in and we're looking at a new BF release complete with a brand new $110 price tag and the best version of BF4 is a test environment meant to help Hardline perform better at launch more than it is meant to help BF4 perform better.

Proof: Where are the patches based on CTE code for ANY platform since that program started?
 
gaaaa, I gotta move away from these shooters. Gotta start hitting up my sp games.
 
IdleHands said:
We should after what we've had to put up with for the last 7 months. Here we are, 7 months in and we're looking at a new BF release complete with a brand new $110 price tag and the best version of BF4 is a test environment meant to help Hardline perform better at launch more than it is meant to help BF4 perform better.

Proof: Where are the patches based on CTE code for ANY platform since that program started?
Click to expand...

Probably never coming, they will be implementing them into BF5.
 
IdleHands said:
We should after what we've had to put up with for the last 7 months. Here we are, 7 months in and we're looking at a new BF release complete with a brand new $110 price tag and the best version of BF4 is a test environment meant to help Hardline perform better at launch more than it is meant to help BF4 perform better.

Proof: Where are the patches based on CTE code for ANY platform since that program started?
Click to expand...

Yeah if this a $60 game it will lol worthy. Fvckin bf4 isn't even completely fixed.
 
Qbert said:
gaaaa, I gotta move away from these shooters. Gotta start hitting up my sp games.
Click to expand...

I pretty much am, at least until Unreal Tournament comes out. I've been playing my SP games lately with only the occasional 1-2 rounds of BF4 on the CTE a couple nights a week.
 
The same issues will hamper this game, it's on EA's rented servers that they rent off companies all over the world, so imagine CoD closer-knit environments but with the terrible servers now. Even for as decent as the game could turn out, it doesn't matter because it's still on all those different companies servers. That is always 50%+ of the problems with EA's games. I don't want to hear how it's not the servers anymore either, it's the netcode, blah blah blah...yes, BF4's netcode was sloppy, but when even Domination & TeamDeathmatch have gone downhill a ton lately in BF4 compared to how it ran not even a month ago or so, you know it's the servers. I never rubberbanded once in TeamDeathmatch or Domination 10 vs. 10 on Xbox One up until about over a month ago. Now every game it stutters at times & the little white boxes on the top right saying "Packet Loss" pop up throughout the match. My internet speed was increased during this time too up to 55 down/6 up on the same company, same network, nothing changed. Same thing is happening to all my friends left & right...all b*tching about rubberbanding in 10 vs. 10. Get your act together EA, then I might support your games more in the future. I'm voting with my wallet from now on. Especially in this stupid spin-off. Battlefield has never been "cops & robbers." This is a lame attempt to spin-off Battlefield & milk the brand name since they couldn't wh*re out Medal of Honor well enough in the past. All EA cares about is using whatever it can to compete with CoD, they don't care if they run a series into the ground, they've done it countless times before.

P.S. They already announced this game at $60, another 'limited edition' version priced above $60, & that they are doing Premium again for this title for $50. *middle finger* lol.
 
Last edited:
A discount for BF4 owners, especially premium, should be the first thing EA do. BF4 was a train wreck of a launch, if they seriously expect people to be happy putting down $60/£40 on a new Battlefield a year later they are mental.
 
devilsgrin_6 said:
The same issues will hamper this game, it's on EA's rented servers that they rent off companies all over the world, so imagine CoD closer-knit environments but with the terrible servers now. Even for as decent as the game could turn out, it doesn't matter because it's still on all those different companies servers. That is always 50%+ of the problems with EA's games. I don't want to hear how it's not the servers anymore either, it's the netcode, blah blah blah...yes, BF4's netcode was sloppy, but when even Domination & TeamDeathmatch have gone downhill a ton lately in BF4 compared to how it ran not even a month ago or so, you know it's the servers. I never rubberbanded once in TeamDeathmatch or Domination 10 vs. 10 on Xbox One up until about over a month ago. Now every game it stutters at times & the little white boxes on the top right saying "Packet Loss" pop up throughout the match. My internet speed was increased during this time too up to 55 down/6 up on the same company, same network, nothing changed. Same thing is happening to all my friends left & right...all b*tching about rubberbanding in 10 vs. 10. Get your act together EA, then I might support your games more in the future. I'm voting with my wallet from now on. Especially in this stupid spin-off. Battlefield has never been "cops & robbers." This is a lame attempt to spin-off Battlefield & milk the brand name since they couldn't wh*re out Medal of Honor well enough in the past. All EA cares about is using whatever it can to compete with CoD, they don't care if they run a series into the ground, they've done it countless times before.

P.S. They already announced this game at $60, another 'limited edition' version priced above $60, & that they are doing Premium again for this title for $50. *middle finger* lol.
Click to expand...

Honestly, server issues have always hampered the BF series ( well BF2 onwards), and it has gotten worse with every game. at least with BF2 you had gamers with their own quality servers with in an hour. In BF the gamer servers seem just as bad as EA servers.

As for the pricing, and premium...Sticking your finger up at EA is misguided. You need to aim it at gamers.
 
Oct 21st is a big day...
This
The Evil Within
Evolve
 
What a surprise, it releases a few weeks before the usual early Nov CoD launch. And as always, no matter how crappy or buggy MoH, BF or BF: H is, EA will force it to stores.
 
So are they trying to really pull in the CoD crowed with this one?

I loved BF3 and this looks cool, but from all the bad things I've heard about how BF4 runs online and other problems this has me worried.
 
Ya know what's sad? The major youtube personalities are already earning their EA paycheck. They can say they don't get benefits and such, but they get flown out for mini-vacations where they get to play the new BF games months before anyone else AND they get a say in how its developed?

So if you watch any of them you'll see that they're already saying things like "I had a blast" and "I was doubtful but after playing it I'm sold!"

This is the exact same sh!t they said last year about BF4. They talked it up like the second coming of christ and then when it launched it was rubbish and they tried to back-peddle with a vid here and there criticizing the game but it's not like they had a choice, they either did that or lost ALL credibility.

I'm pretty much on the verge of unsubbing from these shills and finding new channels to entertain me. I've already canceled subs to 2 of their streams on twitch. Not gonna pay someone that makes more than me to begin with then makes thousands promoting broken games.

/rant
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vampiricsoul
Interesting how he says something like, "They have new ways of solving problems that have plagued Battlefield since it's inception..." but he can't talk about it yet. (3:10 into the vid) What's the surprise? New ultra performance servers that they bought for Naval Strike will be used for Hardline? Who knows, but it's exciting at least that they are doing something. I imagine this Battlefield might run ok/not be super broken after all the slack they got for the last one. One thing I think they are doing is keeping the player counts a bit lower for this one, they really haven't said anything about 32 vs. 32 yet & most of the game modes they've announced look like they are 16 vs. 16 or less? That's just my speculation, we'll see.

 
Last edited:
Jaded Internet Rabble: CoD: Ghosts, Battlefield 4, and Watch Dogs are boring and lame!

All 3 games sell millions and millions of copies.

Jaded Internet Rabble: CoD: Advanced Warfare, Battlefield Hardline, and Destiny are boring and lame!

Once again, millions and millions of copies sold.:D
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TDbank24
Sounds good. Battlefield is amazing it's just not my favorite FPS. It's great having so many awesome shooters to choose from.
 
consolewarz said:
Jaded Internet Rabble: CoD: Ghosts, Battlefield 4, and Watch Dogs are boring and lame!

All 3 games sell millions and millions of copies.

Jaded Internet Rabble: CoD: Advanced Warfare, Battlefield Hardline, and Destiny are boring and lame!

Once again, millions and millions of copies sold.:D
Click to expand...
Yeah, but that's only because there's really nothing else to buy in those genres usually because all the big companies want to do is wh*re the same franchises yearly instead of making anything new or worthwhile.
 
devilsgrin_6 said:
Interesting how he says something like, "They have new ways of solving problems that have plagued Battlefield since it's inception..." but he can't talk about it yet. (3:10 into the vid) What's the surprise? New ultra performance servers that they bought for Naval Strike will be used for Hardline? Who knows, but it's exciting at least that they are doing something. I imagine this Battlefield might run ok/not be super broken after all the slack they got for the last one. One thing I think they are doing is keeping the player counts a bit lower for this one, they really haven't said anything about 32 vs. 32 yet & most of the game modes they've announced look like they are 16 vs. 16 or less? That's just my speculation, we'll see.

Click to expand...


IDK, every new BF game has the same teething problems as the ones before it, why the hell is that?! It's like they throw out everything and start from scratch each game, and if BF3/4 are any indication Hardline will no different. As cool as this game looks (and I love me some BF) I'm out day 1. I'm definitely waiting for some good MP feedback before biting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back