Comparing 360/PS3/XB1/PS4 multiplats/tech stuff

DriedMangoes said:
See how the Xbox One version looks noticeably "rougher" when compared to the more clean and crisp image of the PS4?
Click to expand...
I don't see sh1t that looks noticable more than anything. They look almost the same exept the xbox version looks darker.Which to me makes the rocks look better. If you told me they where swiched...I couldn't argue either way.

Doesn't changed the fact that saying one looks horrible while the other looks great is fukin stupid at best.
 
These guys sound like a bunch of comic book junkies arguing over art, and which artist draws the best feet! *LOL*
 
Cody32599 said:
The guys that wrote the article seem to think differant
Click to expand...
90.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anderson
Cody32599 said:
I notice that you cry alot...and have equated being called a sony fanboy to a racial slurr.The proof is in the quote.
Click to expand...
Immature and wrong as usual. You're going to bring race into this, really? That's flamebait if I've ever seen it.
 
He's saying you whine a lot, sound like a "victim." I agree and have said the same.

consolewarz said:
Nobody said the upscaling filters were mandatory on this forum. You are literally making things up, as usual.

Note how every single strawman and false accusation on this forum comes with 0 quotes, links, or anything resembling evidence. It's probably deliberate at this point.
Click to expand...

No, he's right. There was a thread posted by Yoyo with "sharpness filter mandated by Microsoft" in the title. Granted, it had a question mark at the end, but the implication was there, and it was also there in several posts in that thread and elsewhere. That's where I was coming from, when I was asking Ketto whether the filter was mandatory.
 
Last edited:
Anderson said:
He's saying you whine a lot, sound like a "victim." I agree and have said the same.

No, he's right. There was a thread posted by Yoyo with "sharpness filter mandated by Microsoft" in the title. Granted, it had a question mark at the end, but the implication was there, and it was also there in several posts in that thread and elsewhere. That's where I was coming from, when I was asking Ketto whether the filter was mandatory.
Click to expand...
I get falsely accused of things all the time on this forum. No matter how many times I point it out they keep doing it. I'll continue pointing out projection by posters doing the exact thing they falsely accuse me of. Call it whatever you want, I'm still right.

He's not right. Nobody said that MS was "mandating" an upscaling filter as a fact. Unless you want to rewrite the rules of grammar and claim a question is a statement of fact.
 
Last edited:
consolewarz said:
Redgaming tech does a PS4/PC AC4 comparison.
DICE: Battlefield 4 Sub-1080p on Xbox One/PS4 “Well Worth” it; Consoles have “Untapped Potential”
Click to expand...

What happend to all of there console idiots that said launch games are all going to be 1080p 60fps because there isn't anything to learn as it is a PC architecture?

and saying 60fps in PS4 BF4 is being really generous, yea it's 60 fps when you're looking at the sky, but in the midst of battle it's closer to like 40.
 
eVo7 said:
saying 60fps in PS4 BF4 is being really generous, yea it's 60 fps when you're looking at the sky, but in the midst of battle it's closer to like 40.
Click to expand...

yeah, there's no way in hell BF4 on next gen console is a solid 60 fps. If I could slap on a fps counter on next gen console versions...I'd swear it was between 40 and 50.
 
Qbert said:
yeah, there's no way in hell BF4 on next gen console is a solid 60 fps. If I could slap on a fps counter on next gen console versions...I'd swear it was between 40 and 50.
Click to expand...

I'd agree for the X1 version. There are definite fps drops and no way it holds 60. Overall it runs well for all that is going on, but calling it a 60 fps game is not accurate. It seems to stay above 30 for the most part which isn't bad overall.
 
Kerosene31 said:
I'd agree for the X1 version. There are definite fps drops and no way it holds 60. Overall it runs well for all that is going on, but calling it a 60 fps game is not accurate. It seems to stay above 30 for the most part which isn't bad overall.
Click to expand...



Yeah, same with PS4. It's indeed pretty smooth, but certainly not a solid 60 fps game. Calling it so is deceptive.
 
If that's the case (and it is) then BF4 on my PC runs at the framerate cap of 200fps @ Ultra with 4xAA.

It's funny, they talk about 60fps this and that, but the time when you need to the framerate to be as high as possible, in the heat of battle, it's not, it's closer to 40. Then really what is the point of targeting 60fps if it can't be maintained when needed most?
 
Kerosene31 said:
I'd agree for the X1 version. There are definite fps drops and no way it holds 60. Overall it runs well for all that is going on, but calling it a 60 fps game is not accurate. It seems to stay above 30 for the most part which isn't bad overall.
Click to expand...
Speak for your self, my copy runs at 60 fps and not once I have seen a frame drop anywhere.
 
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back