he’s at blizzard now, no? If so he may have some insight or will soon once they get def kits to port diablo 4
No that's Ybarra, Penello is at Amazon.
he’s at blizzard now, no? If so he may have some insight or will soon once they get def kits to port diablo 4
This is new info.Yeah but he's also making the assumption that they are going for that price point etc. We don't know what it will be, it could be 9.2 it could be 12.8 or anywhere in-between. I do think it's funny how hysterical some people on resetera are about these things when we simply don't know. That guy Klee who has supposedly confirmed his sources with their mods says the PS5 is slightly more powerful but that both consoles are so close it doesn't matter and that both are going to look pretty much the same and the world is fine. Now all of the sudden some people start talking about old info that's been around for something like 6 months and the sky is falling lol.
IF PS5 ends up 9.2 TF's or less...they best not charge $500.
Hoping there is something PS5 related!
The future is coming
At CES 2020 Sony is unveiling a unique vision of the future, bringing creativity and technology together like never before, to unleash new sensations and emotions.
Watch Our CES 2020 Press Conference Live
Come back here at 17:00 PST on January 6, 2020 to see the Sony CES 2020 Press Conference live, or watch it after the event.
Yup and hopefully Low Input Lag/4K/120 TV's.More than likely, they're unveiling their new TV line up.
People are saying no AMD made RT.
Sony is likely offering a custom solution.
Maybe the RT tech in the PS5 isn't as far along as the xsx and or Sony wanted a cheaper custom solution that they or someone else could make?Does that really make any sense though? Sony partners with AMD to make the CPU/GPU for their console, RT was coming along next year so why would Sony go out of their way to come up with their own RT and then make AMD work it into the GPU hardware when they already have a solution for it? I don't know, a lot of people seem to be grasping at straws for some reason.
I'm honestly still suspect of the 12 TF number. I still think it's the whole " TF aren't a good metric, and 10 TF now amounts to what 12 used to be" kinda thing. Dude from DF does keep saying 12, but I don't know if he's just extrapolating "2x power of the One X" verbage...Why are people back on the no RT when Cerny brought that up in the second interivew himself? he said it's GPU accelerated RT.
There are some now on resetera saying XSX is RDNA1 and they brought hardware accelerated RT up for it the same way some here have been saying Sony did for the PS5. I think it's best that we don't put too much stock in what the rank and file say over there, most of them seem as clueless if not more so than any of us.
Someone did make a good point over there about paying attention to what's not being said, people assume double X1X is 12TF RDNA which is not true, it's less than that, 12TF RDNA would be a decent amount higher than twice as powerful as the X1X but people keep putting words in Phil's mouth. People assume it's RDNA 2 because the wording on the XSX page says "next gen rdna architechture" which actually could mean that it's RDNA1 because they didn't say "next gen OF rdna" RDNA is next gen compared to GCN.
I'm not saying I believe that stuff one way or the other but when they are asked to confirm it directly MS hasn't done so, it's best to wait until they give us the actual specs before we believe too much of what's being said over on resetera or even from some gaming sites because they seem to have taken to trusting 2nd hand sources for their reporting. It could end up that XSX is 12TF rdna 2 and that'd be great, ps5 could be as well or they could be somewhere lower and still be awesome even if they were RDNA1. I am just ready for a new generation already and next holiday can't come soon enough lol.
Not to mention you wouldn't expect a separately developed component to be as efficient as one designed as part...Does that really make any sense though? Sony partners with AMD to make the CPU/GPU for their console, RT was coming along next year so why would Sony go out of their way to come up with their own RT and then make AMD work it into the GPU hardware when they already have a solution for it? I don't know, a lot of people seem to be grasping at straws for some reason.
I'm honestly still suspect of the 12 TF number. I still think it's the whole " TF aren't a good metric, and 10 TF now amounts to what 12 used to be" kinda thing. Dude from DF does keep saying 12, but I don't know if he's just extrapolating "2x power of the One X" verbage...
The Dev kit thing could just be a difference in not having up-to-date kits. It's way too early for people to be freaking out or speaking in effective absolutes.
Does that really make any sense though? Sony partners with AMD to make the CPU/GPU for their console, RT was coming along next year so why would Sony go out of their way to come up with their own RT and then make AMD work it into the GPU hardware when they already have a solution for it? I don't know, a lot of people seem to be grasping at straws for some reason.
Maybe they believed that the ps5 was actually gonna release this year and software solution was their only option???
Spencer said Gears 5 outsold Gears 4.No it's hardware accelerated, Cerny said that himself.
I hadn't read this about BC:
"The report also suggests that the alleged PS5 GPU will be able to switch between three modes in order to offer backwards compatibility with PS4 and PS4 Pro titles. While a “gen 2” mode is evidently what the PS5 will normally be running next-gen games on, according to the report, its two separate “gen 1” and “gen 0” modes allow for backward compatibility. The gen 1 mode features the exact same metrics as a PS4 Pro: 36 compute units, a 911MHz core clock, and 218GB/s of memory bandwidth and 64 ROPs. "