Hey, they did with the 360 era with NetflixI can't believe they went through the entire last generation with F2P still behind the paywall, it was just a dumb thing to do.
Hey, they did with the 360 era with NetflixI can't believe they went through the entire last generation with F2P still behind the paywall, it was just a dumb thing to do.
Hey, they did with the 360 era with Netflix
Both of these things are kinda like parallels of WTF for the last 2 gens. I think they really need more consistent messaging. I have to be critical when I think they deserve it. They like to brag about it when they think they are being so pro-comsumer, but then miss the obvious things that just seem petty. I can never tell if it's greed or negligence.And people complained then.
None of the apps, especially ones that require a sub should have been behind Gold
Both but it's unfair to really call it greed, they are in this business to make money as are Sony and Nintendo it's just what businesses do. They could have just done what Sony did and raised 1st party game prices, it'll bring in a little more from people who don't want game pass and could also make game pass look more appealing for people who are on the fence. At some point gold, GP or game prices are going to have to go up though it's just a matter of time, games aren't getting cheaper to make.Both of these things are kinda like parallels of WTF for the last 2 gens. I think they really need more consistent messaging. I have to be critical when I think they deserve it. They like to brag about it when they think they are being so pro-comsumer, but then miss the obvious things that just seem petty. I can never tell if it's greed or negligence.
Yeah, I guess the word petty would be more appropriate than greed. I don't know what the metrics are, but I would think it would be possible to see those FTP games as a sort of gateway drug to other paid experiences (sorry, probably bad terminology there). It's this kind of lack of long-term thinking that makes me think more of the negligence angle.Both but it's unfair to really call it greed, they are in this business to make money as are Sony and Nintendo it's just what businesses do. They could have just done what Sony did and raised 1st party game prices, it'll bring in a little more from people who don't want game pass and could also make game pass look more appealing for people who are on the fence. At some point gold, GP or game prices are going to have to go up though it's just a matter of time, games aren't getting cheaper to make.
It was a stupid move. More stupid then their Xbox One reveal. But reversing course is the right move. There are so many things they have done right, which includes their games. I would have still stuck with MS because they are making the games we want. I just would have done it on PC instead.I'm of two minds. The initial decision is the dumbest one in over 7 years from the division. The 180 was impressively fast for a large corporation. It usually takes time for those things to go into effect.
In the end, this is where I remind everyone corporations aren't people. They're machines with a lot of people pushing buttons at the same time. Consumers help steer them.
I plan on upgrading to a newer pc, it was just easier and the opportunity was there to get XSX. Plus, I like the brand.It was a stupid move. More stupid then their Xbox One reveal. But reversing course is the right move. There are so many things they have done right, which includes their games. I would have still stuck with MS because they are making the games we want. I just would have done it on PC instead.
Now I can go back to appreciating my Xbox Series X purchase.
No, MS is a company. A company is run by people. Xbox is run by Phil. He isn't a face,he is the face...and two faced at that.This is true. He is a face. But the real person here is Microsoft. They are a $1.7 trillion company for a reason. Same with Google, Amazon, and others. They are here for the $$, not to be a charity.
exactly the same as I played Civ 6 on my PC this morning then.I plan on upgrading to a newer pc, it was just easier and the opportunity was there to get XSX. Plus, I like the brand.
There's so something to sitting in a comfy chair, turning on your nice TV and hopping right into a game.
No, MS is a company. A company is run by people. Xbox is run by Phil. He isn't a face,he is the face...and two faced at that.
like it was charity before and didn't earn a billion+ annually.
Um ok?No, MS is a company. A company is run by people. Xbox is run by Phil. He isn't a face,he is the face...and two faced at that.
like it was charity before and didn't earn a billion+ annually.
that is what I was saying unless there was something else.We don’t know what happened here with this. It smacks of some power play behind the scenes in MS. The fact it got turned around so fast speaks volumes (from both player feedback and corporate response). As does the fact that it didn’t come from Phil and he didn’t try to defend it either. I think something went on here at a senior level in MS, possibly something like Nadella pushing it out, or being advised to without Phils involvement. The whole the way thing was announced and rolled back was nothing like we’ve since the Xbox one fiasco.
Hey, I am with you on thatAnd people complained then.
None of the apps, especially ones that require a sub should have been behind Gold
Yep they're going to have to do something for all these acquisitions and rising development costs on those AAA games.Sorry but what MS was attempting was way worse.
Also $70 games will be on Xbox as well.
We can thank Take 2 for starting this trend.
Don’t forget, once Bethesda is under their wing they’ll probably hire a studio size QA department for elder scrolls/fallout, hopefullyYep they're going to have to do something for all these acquisitions and rising development costs on those AAA games.
Game development is not getting cheaper.
Not now.RIP XBOX
Right TeKPhaN ?
Phil is head of xbox, it is his responsability.We don’t know what happened here with this. It smacks of some power play behind the scenes in MS. The fact it got turned around so fast speaks volumes (from both player feedback and corporate response). As does the fact that it didn’t come from Phil and he didn’t try to defend it either. I think something went on here at a senior level in MS, possibly something like Nadella pushing it out, or being advised to without Phils involvement. The whole the way thing was announced and rolled back was nothing like we’ve since the Xbox one fiasco.
Increasing prices isn't the answer. At some point this will send gaming on a downward trend.Yep they're going to have to do something for all these acquisitions and rising development costs on those AAA games.
Game development is not getting cheaper.
of course but even he was a few more bosses above him.Phil is head of xbox, it is his responsability.