That's very different. Messing with content within a game is really annoying to most gamers, and confusing to casuals.
That's very different. Messing with content within a game is really annoying to most gamers, and confusing to casuals.
Fable, Avowed, Outer Worlds, Pillars of Eternity, Fallout, Elder Scrolls.
Is Starfield an RPG?
JinCA
And if you read between the lines...those 'other consoles' are Nintendo consoles. What they have been doing so far.
And if you read between the lines...those 'other consoles' are Nintendo consoles. What they have been doing so far.
They could also keep games multi-platform, rake in the money from that huge install base, and entice people to Game Pass and Xbox with those games where you'd have to buy them on Playstation. Not a bad balance that way.
Do they have a choice to not honour the exclusivity commitments?
Xbox fans were, yes. PS fans were not.
But the reality is people weren't pissed for the same reason few were pissed about Microsoft's purchases because you can't really compare Sony buying Insomniac and Microsoft buying Playground to this.[/quote]
Why not? Is there some sort of price or quantity rule?
I mean the whole point of Game Pass is forward thinking as it's a subscription based thing. I pay about 80ish bucks a year for Game Pass Ultimate which a third more expensive than the price of a brand new $60 game and you get literally hundreds of games all at once.
Say a game leaves Game Pass, you have the option to buy it for generally about half off IIRC (only bought one game after it left GP). There's value in that lol, especially as someone who doesn't buy games anymore for the most part. I generally just play whatever's on GamePass and buy the occasional game once or twice a year.
PS I'm pretty sure you at one point called Game Pass literally worse than Hitler, Stalin, and Genghis Khan combined and if you like it you supported Osama Bin Laden
Good question, but that seems to answer the current question. Everything will be Xbox/PC guaranteed. No PS version is guaranteed.
None of that makes it ok or not ok. I'm not arguing who has better console warriors.
Because Insomniac wss pretty much a 1st party studio anyway. Sunset Overdrive wss a rare exception. Playground only ever made Forza. There is a stark contrast between those 2 and buying Bethesda who has been a big 3rd party dev for so very long.
lets pray for those guys to come out alright.
Fair enough. But my stance is, if we are going to see this stuff happening from both companies (like it always has), then it is what it is. We have no control over the decisions. And they are not spending $7.5 billion dollars because of some plastic worshipers on the internet. They are doing it for THEMSELVES. Both companies actually are doing it for themselves.
I feel like Doom should be a Minecraft type situation with sequels on all the platforms.
But its MS's money and decision.
But its MS's money and decision.
No console warriors are good. I still am of the opinion that PS has nastier fanboys. It's honestly the only time I ever see the words "pathetic" and "disgusting". Not here, but in comment sections around the net. One of the reasons I love this place.
This is pathetic and disgusting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are pathetic and disgusting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you played Project Cars 3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Even more interesting is that only 2 games were mentioned.
This is how I see this being played out:
Big Budget AAA games like TES 6 or Fallout 5 exclusive to PC/Xbox.
Smaller budget games like The Outer Worlds, etc...go to the Swtich as well.