Xbox One X

Status
Not open for further replies.
Many have the Pro and the fact is that box, along with maybe marketing agreements, are holding the XOX back. Just look at Destiny 2 as an example. Support those games with actual money those who do an honest effort with the better hardware.

LOL Marketing agreements aren't holding anything back, MS has the marketing for Anthem and AC and both are checker boarded and 30 fps. Is marketing making Crackdown 3 or Gears of War's campaign 30fps or that the MP portion has adaptive resolution to keep it at 60 fps on X1X? Nope, it's a combo of the limitations of the tech in the box and also the engines the devs are using and where they choose to focus the power. MS never said to expect double framerates in games and nobody should expect that, you'll find it done here and there but the vast majority of titles will target the same framerate as the base consoles.
 
Last edited:
We'll, s***. It's a good thing you aren't going to fool yourself into thinking that all games will be 4K, seeing as how Phil said devs can use the power any way they want. That in itself says not all games will be 4K. You're quick. lol

Once again, if it was a "TRUE 4K" console they wouldn't have to make the choice to lower the resolution, the games would just be 4K and the choices would be in other areas like framerate and detail settings. Native 4K can happen for certain types of games yes, calling it a 4K capable machine isn't wrong, saying it's a true 4K machine is.
 
It's starting to get really old that VaLLiancE continues to be allowed to post in a One X forum as a resident troll. As much as 90% of what he says doesn't bother me but he is turning this thread into a "PS4 Pro is better as it's $100 cheaper" one man campaign.

Plainview can you and mods not do something about this?
I said in this thread PS4 Pro is better and $100 cheaper?

tenor.gif
 
LOL Marketing agreements aren't holding anything back, MS has the marketing for Anthem and AC and both are checker boarded and 30 fps. Is marketing making Crackdown 3 or Gears of War's campaign 30fps on X1X? Nope, it's a combo of the limitations of the tech in the box and also the engines the devs are using and where they choose to focus the power.

I'm going to play devils advocate here.

What you said here is a double edged sword.

I will tell you why.

If one console is ~44% more powerful than the other according to many in this forum, why is it matching performance wise the lesser console?

If the power is there why isn't it being used? You can't have it both ways by saying 'the tech' is holding it back and in the same sentiment acknowledge that 'there are no marketing deals causing it either'. One console is more powerful than the other and it isn't by a small amount.
So what can it be when the power difference is very CLEARLY there?

I will agree with you about it really depends on how the devs choose to harness the extra power, but if Destiny 2 comes out performing AND looking near identical on the XB1X to the PS4 Pro version your above statement will be proven false.
 
I'm going to play devils advocate here.

What you said here is a double edged sword.

I will tell you why.

If one console is ~44% more powerful than the other according to many in this forum, why is it matching performance wise the lesser console?

If the power is there why isn't it being used? You can't have it both ways by saying 'the tech' is holding it back and in the same sentiment acknowledge that 'there are no marketing deals causing it either'. One console is more powerful than the other and it isn't by a small amount.
So what can it be when the power difference is very CLEARLY there?

I will agree with you about it really depends on how the devs choose to harness the extra power, but if Destiny 2 comes out performing AND looking near identical on the XB1X to the PS4 Pro version your above statement will be proven false.

Because the GPU is where most of that performance difference comes from, the CPU tends to be what's holding the framerates down and it isn't that big of a jump over what is in the Pro. Not only that but Sony already had a more efficient CPU set up before MS made their improvements to the CPU in the One X. Both CPU's are still underpowered and can't really double framerates in most games.

These things were made to make games look better, the boost in CPU will help with some things and hopefully keep framerates more solid but you can't double the production of what the CPU is doing if you are only jumping from 1.75mhz in the base X1 to 2.3mhz in the One X, or if you want to compare the Pro to X1X it's 2.1 vs 2.3. Even Richard at DF said that the jump isn't big enough in CPU to make the One X version twice the framerate of the Pro version.

Take another game, AC Origins, MS has the marketing rights to that game yet it's "4K checker boarded with variable resolution" on both consoles. I don't doubt it'll be higher res than the Pro version at all times and it should be but the fact that it's not even native 4K or 60 fps shows that there is only so much devs can do with this power, especially when the biggest chunk of dev time is going to be spent on the X1 and PS4 rather than the refresh consoles.
 
Last edited:
LOL Marketing agreements aren't holding anything back, MS has the marketing for Anthem and AC and both are checker boarded and 30 fps. Is marketing making Crackdown 3 or Gears of War's campaign 30fps or that the MP portion has adaptive resolution to keep it at 60 fps on X1X? Nope, it's a combo of the limitations of the tech in the box and also the engines the devs are using and where they choose to focus the power. MS never said to expect double framerates in games and nobody should expect that, you'll find it done here and there but the vast majority of titles will target the same framerate as the base consoles.

We don't know what is in these agreements. When a remaster of a decade old game is a timed exclusive because of a marketing agreement then that shows you how ridiculous these deals are.
 
We don't know what is in these agreements. When a remaster of a decade old game is a timed exclusive because of a marketing agreement then that shows you how ridiculous these deals are.

The PS4 is over 40% more powerful than the X1 yet Destiny ran at 30 fps and 1080p on both consoles, was Bungie holding something back then? nope, it's just the way their game runs. Just because the PC version can hit 60 fps doesn't mean that it will on all PC's, they'll likely have to have CPU's that are much better than the ones in either of these consoles to do that.
 
The PS4 is over 40% more powerful than the X1 yet Destiny ran at 30 fps and 1080p on both consoles, was Bungie holding something back then? nope, it's just the way their game runs. Just because the PC version can hit 60 fps doesn't mean that it will on all PC's, they'll likely have to have CPU's that are much better than the ones in either of these consoles to do that.

I think Bungie could have used the strengths of each console a bit more.
 
It's starting to get really old that VaLLiancE continues to be allowed to post in a One X forum as a resident troll. As much as 90% of what he says doesn't bother me but he is turning this thread into a "PS4 Pro is better as it's $100 cheaper" one man campaign.

Plainview can you and mods not do something about this?

Val has been pretty consistent from the beginning in saying that X wouldn't be running most games at 4k. Even before E3 that had third party games using CB there.

X is going to be amazing. Don't let the truth kill your hype for the machine.

Plus it's early days. We'll see what the machine is capable of when more devs get their hands on it.
 
Best way to deal with trolls is to not take the bait. Who cares how Destiny runs on the X? I'm buying the X day one, but I'll play Destiny 2 on my PS Pro. Console wars won. Get both :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimmyD and JinCA
I was pretty sure the mods have said no talk of the ps4 to compare in this thread.

Plainview can we get a hammer drop here?

That should go for people who say "you can't handle that the X1X is more powerful than the Pro" as well. Bottom line is it's happening all around, comparing as far as technical expectations is one thing, comparing game libraries etc is another. There is no comparison as far as which one is more powerful, the only valid reason to compare is to get sort of a jumping off point as to what should be expected and what shouldn't.
 
It's starting to get really old that VaLLiancE continues to be allowed to post in a One X forum as a resident troll. As much as 90% of what he says doesn't bother me but he is turning this thread into a "PS4 Pro is better as it's $100 cheaper" one man campaign.

Plainview can you and mods not do something about this?

Meanwhile, in the PS4 Discussion thread, Val has been trying to talk someone into getting the Xbox One X. :laugh:
 
That should go for people who say "you can't handle that the X1X is more powerful than the Pro" as well.

Negative comments about Sony or PS4, or about how MS is better than Sony, or (lately) about how X1X is better than Pro, have been a consistent part of Xbox One Discussion threads since this forum began. There is never any complaining about that, just agrees and likes.

Can't have it both ways. You cultivate a "vs," console war discussion, that's what you'll get.

I think you should consider yourself* fortunate that you only have to deal with one or two detractors. Everyone else here seems very supportive of Xbox. That is not the way it is in most forums.

*not meaning you, JinCA. Just used your post as a jumping-off point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimmyD
The PS4 is over 40% more powerful than the X1 yet Destiny ran at 30 fps and 1080p on both consoles, was Bungie holding something back then? nope, it's just the way their game runs. Just because the PC version can hit 60 fps doesn't mean that it will on all PC's, they'll likely have to have CPU's that are much better than the ones in either of these consoles to do that.

That's true and the reason it is, is because even low end CPU's for PC's are faster than the Jaguars in the consoles.
 
Negative comments about Sony or PS4, or about how MS is better than Sony, or (lately) about how X1X is better than Pro, have been a consistent part of Xbox One Discussion threads since this forum began. There is never any complaining about that, just agrees and likes.

Can't have it both ways. You cultivate a "vs," console war type discussion, you're going to get it.

I think you find it's one, maybe two at most, posting nonsense in here....I don't care what one of em is posting in the PS4 thread as I don't have any need or desire to go and troll it........#justsayin
 
I think you find it's one, maybe two at most, posting nonsense in here....I don't care what one of em is posting in the PS4 thread as I don't have any need or desire to go and troll it........#justsayin

I wasn't suggesting you go troll the PS forum. I was making a humorous counterpoint about Val's behavior. Oh well. Humor doesn't work well on the internet sometimes (or in real life, for that matter).
 
I think you find it's one, maybe two at most, posting nonsense in here....I don't care what one of em is posting in the PS4 thread as I don't have any need or desire to go and troll it........#justsayin
who cares? all you do is falsely accuse and bitch and moan.......#justsayinanditsgettingold
 
How about someone can create an alternate Xbox One X thread that compares it to the PS4 Pro 4 and also expands on a lack of MS first party titles as well as MS faux 4k. I promise not to venture into thread so as not to disrupt the discussion environment. See there? Everyone's happy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frozpot
How about someone can create an alternate Xbox One X thread that compares it to the PS4 Pro 4 and also expands on a lack of MS first party titles as well as MS faux 4k. I promise not to venture into thread so as not to disrupt the discussion environment. See there? Everyone's happy.
We have one already but certain posters go OT and troll other consoles here in this one and than when someone responds/takes the bait they blame the authority for letting it happen but fail to mention what they do.
They have no courage to go 2 the VS threads and rather bash non XB stuff here.
 
We have one already but certain posters go OT and troll other consoles here in this one and than when someone responds/takes the bait they blame the authority for letting it happen but fail to mention what they do.
They have no courage to go 2 the VS threads and rather bash non XB stuff here.

It's really infantile and pathetically funny
 
How about someone can create an alternate Xbox One X thread that compares it to the PS4 Pro 4 and also expands on a lack of MS first party titles as well as MS faux 4k. I promise not to venture into thread so as not to disrupt the discussion environment. See there? Everyone's happy.

Majority of people on this forum don't give a **** about this pissing match or list wars. A handful of people are obsessed with it don't represent the community. You guys need to find a new site when you're in the mood for it.
 
Not sure about anyone else but its annoying when you see so much misinformation or misrepresentation about the 1X. Id just like to clear the air. It seems there's so much controversy over plain as day facts. Either some are being willfully dense, or have selective reading comprehensive skills. It's embarrassing to me as a gamer when I see others within the community in which I and others know full well what these new consoles represent. Instead, they'd prefer to push "false true 4K" narrative.

Some of these same Katz (even though we don't always see eye to eye) in whom I've come to respect [some] of their knowledge on hardware, have adopted this confusing narrative for, who the Fuk knows... s*** is a trip, it's a trip.
 
Not sure about anyone else but its annoying when you see so much misinformation or misrepresentation about the 1X. Id just like to clear the air. It seems there's so much controversy over plain as day facts. Either some are being willfully dense, or have selective reading comprehensive skills. It's embarrassing to me as a gamer when I see others within the community in which I and others know full well what these new consoles represent. Instead, they'd prefer to push "false true 4K" narrative.

Some of these same Katz (even though we don't always see eye to eye) in whom I've come to respect [some] of their knowledge on hardware, have adopted this confusing narrative for, who the Fuk knows... s*** is a trip, it's a trip.

I don't disagree...it is a mind bender.
 
Not sure about anyone else but its annoying when you see so much misinformation or misrepresentation about the 1X. Id just like to clear the air. It seems there's so much controversy over plain as day facts. Either some are being willfully dense, or have selective reading comprehensive skills. It's embarrassing to me as a gamer when I see others within the community in which I and others know full well what these new consoles represent. Instead, they'd prefer to push "false true 4K" narrative.

Some of these same Katz (even though we don't always see eye to eye) in whom I've come to respect [some] of their knowledge on hardware, have adopted this confusing narrative for, who the Fuk knows... s*** is a trip, it's a trip.

It just comes down to how you want to define "true" 4K.

I think it's fine to call it that because X was designed to run Microsoft's first party games in 4k. And it looks, at least so far, like that will be the case.

Third party efforts have always been left to those developers design choices. I think Microsoft has been very clear about that.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.