Uncharted 4 1080p and targeting 60fps

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry, but if it doesn't run real time, it cannot be considered best visuals, & there are stronger reason to believe its NOT real-time, than it is.
Yeah, it was maybe the best-looking trailer, but we have no idea if it was representative of the actual game's visuals or not.

Best looking game trailer @E3

Fixt yere readin for ya.
 
They should come out and say whether it's realtime or pre-rendered. And it's almost certainly pre-rendered.
 
Corrinne Yu post pretty much confirm its NOT Real time. Paolo asked a simple question, Is it real time? She could have said, "yes its real time." That would have been enough.

But she went around & say a bunch of stuff, using some key words, like 'real game levels', 'running on a real PS4', but skipped the very answer to the question "real time", non did she mention if it ran 30 or 60fps (which is also an indication that its real time).

You do not need Sherlock Holmes to deduced that she was trying to avoid/mislead people. Sony do not need to do this, but they did. A bit disappointing for them to try to mislead. Prehaps its a way to show PS4 have the top visuals that X1 cannot reach, but there is a proper way to do this, but its not this.

Thank you.

It's wonderful to see such a sensible, logical deduction.

She's brilliant, talented, and in-the-know... Did she ever say rendered real-time, on the fly, at full 60fps? No... She so specifically did NOT say as much that it's more probable (at this point) that it's not actually real-time. She had a clear opportunity, and she wasn't clear... And she'd know as much.

My magic 8-ball is saying all signs point to pre-rendered...
 
But actually reading what they and the analysts say is that its real time!!
But continue to spin bottabotta spin!

Analysts (quite frankly) are usually wanna-be's who couldn't get a real job in the industry of value, so they critique other people's work in a black box and make money doing it... and driving hits to their site is more valueable to them than speaking the truth.

Look, no analysts can tell you $hit about whether or not that video was real-time, because it's a video. They don't have any executibile running on dev hardware, all they're doing is pointing out flaws in the rendering precision, and using that as justification that it *must* (therefore) be real-time. There are rendering flaws all OVER the place in UC pre-rendered cinematics from all three games. You know why? Because they're IN-ENGINE. They're not using fancy CGI hardware and software Hollywood uses to generate high-end CGI, they're using an engine which does also produce real-time graphics, but that does nothing to prove (or even lend credibility to the idea) that the video was therefore real-time.

Anyone selling you it's "real-time" based on the video is a snake oil salesman at best. There's literally nothing you can deduce from the video, more than the simple fact that high-end CGI rendering hardware/software wasn't used.. because if it was, you'd expect the lighting to be far better (among other things).

So "analysts" opinions here are meaningless. They can't tell $hit from the video.

No spin required. The one of the bunch I'd trust most has danced around the topic. When given an opportunity to say whether it was real-time or not, she specifically avoided answering... she knows... and she's got enough integrity not to lie, but she needs to beat the corporate drum and play the role as best she can, so she did... and she (essentially) confirmed it's pre-rendered.

Follow the conversation:

"Was the trailer pre-rendered, or was it running in real-time"?
"It was running in-engine. It was an actual level from the game."

That doesn't answer the question. I simple "yes" would have worked.

No, what she did was clear. She intentionally avoided a straight answer, because a straight answer would go against the line her corporate big-wigs are trying to feed the consumers... I don't blame her. Anyone who's willing to have a voice in the industry has to do stuff like that, and it's uncomfortable.. which is why I hope my name never gets out. I want to be able to have real opinions, and speak my mind without censoring it, or conforming it to the will of my "mother-ship". I like being able to say that Sony did a better job than us with marketing their product, and that we've made mistakes. I like being able to say, "Yeah - Ryse probably is the best looking game (or close to it), but it's not all real-time. There are MANY in-engine/pre-rendered movies in Ryse"... and I don't have to feed anyone a line. I can tell it as it is. I can be completely honest.

So yeah, I'm unconvinced... but wait, I said I'd stop ranting about this, didn't I?

Shoot. Welp, I'll shut up now.
 
Jesus. Had to clean up some trash posts in here. Consolewarz, I am not going to tell you again. Ease up or sleep on it.
 
It's the in-game cutscene. So the gameplay will look similar just like how UC2 and UC3 looks amazing.
 
because no one wants to believe the impossible is possible. that would be going too much against the bar they conceived to be the standard. give it time... to consistently engage is pointless as a wall of posts seems to gather more attention than logic, I found with every single generation.
 
It hasn't happened yet, so we have no reason to believe it will.
 
We are still arguing this after being told by multiple people that its real time? I can't believe Flynn is still allowed to post in this sub forum he's either a troll or a astroturfer.
 
We are still arguing this after being told by multiple people that its real time?
rofling.gif
 
It's funny, because you said people were saying it's not realtime. Who said that?
 
Sony info: Nah not possible not going to look like that
MS info: Dat SDK, dem updates, dat cloud oh man parity is coming
 
I can't believe Flynn is still allowed to post in this sub forum he's either a troll or a astroturfer.

Yeah, it's pretty ridiclous to say the least. There's absolutely no excuse for it at all. I have him on ignore, but still constantly see threads being ruined by the guy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.