Nivida: Our console does 1080p 60fps multiplatforms for $199
- Thread starter de3d1
- Start date
Please show each individual step, and the latency from each.
Otherwise, retract your false statement.
Wow... then you must think the PS3 and Vita are WAY overpriced, right? NVIDIA's console is twice as powerful as a PS3... not to mention, capable of 4K video and streaming games end-to-end with higher quality graphics and frame rate than PS4 titles, and with less latency than PS3's #1 rated exclusive.
The shield has the latest Tegra, the X1, not the K1 from other top tablets lol. Its a badass little chipset.
The new chipsit almost doubles the performance of their previous Tegra K1 you are talking about with this new console.
http://www.dailytech.com/NVIDIAs+64...ower+of+K1+Guns+for+Qualcomm/article37049.htm
The 150ms is quoted from another poster. Ask him.
Streaming will add latency that's for sure.
The fastest supercomputer in the year 2000 took up 1600sq ft and took 500,000 watts of power
The Tegra X1 is the same performance and is the size of a thumbnail and uses 10 watts of power.
Source: Nvidia
http://www.phonearena.com/news/NVID...-with-twice-the-power-of-the-Tegra-K1_id64343
The Tegra X1 is the same performance and is the size of a thumbnail and uses 10 watts of power.
Source: Nvidia
http://www.phonearena.com/news/NVID...-with-twice-the-power-of-the-Tegra-K1_id64343
Its not more powerful then the PS3.
Killzone 2 is FAR from the highest rated PS3 exclusive LOL
Input lag removes any advantage it could hope to have over the PS4.
EDIT You see he keeps quoting me with OT BS
Last edited:
If it's twice as powerful as the 360, how is it not more powerful than the PS3. Both of those consoles are like 10 yrs old now...
That's what they claim... Its also been said/claimed the PS3 was 2-3 times more powerful than the 360. Claims can be silly
It absolutely is.
The Maxwell GPU architecture is the most efficient on the market right now.
The X1 configuration has over double the pixel fill rate of PS3, greater texel fill rate, unified shaders, GPU compute, more memory, more cache, greater CPU integer performance, pushes more polygons, has a more advanced feature set that supports the latest APIs and has more GFLOPS.
http://international.download.nvidia.com/pdf/tegra/Tegra-X1-whitepaper-v1.0.pdf
It beats last gen consoles hands down.
Last edited:
It couldn't have a Maxwell built in it unless its a much less power using,powerful version.
It is right there in the whitepaper link. It is obviously not the same size as the desktop version but it is a Maxwell GPU.
It has 256 CUDA cores.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8811/nvidia-tegra-x1-preview/2
Last edited:
Right like I said a much less powerful version as the desktop destroys the PS4/XBO and they Destroy this.
So X1 destroys ps3 or are we not believing claims for this comparison?
Did you find an tegra tablet more powerful than X1 for $500 yet?
1. It's significantly more powerful. You're wrong.
2.Uncharted 2 is the game I was referring to.
Before you respond, try to understand what you're responding to.
But it is still more powerful than PS3 in every metric, which was the original point you denied.
Possibly but if they are claiming 2 times the 360 in power and Sony claimed 2-3 times the 360 with the PS3 then something is off.
The Tegra tablets are around $200.
You mentioned KZ2 no?
Uncharted 2 didn't have input lagg complaints like KZ2 did.
Either way you mentioning UC2,KZ2 and PS4 is off topic.
How is something off? This is a brand new cutting edge GPU, it's doubling the power of a 10 year old console, not its newest released competitor.
Brand new cutting edge GPU?
That is a bit far fetched to say considering its mobile based.
You laughed at my post are you saying its just like a Maxwell that is used in desktop computers?
Not Tegra X1 tablets at $200, that's were you are confused, you don't understand the difference. K1 was the top Tegra processor and very powerful, the X1 in this "console" is double that performance.
I can see why you are even more confused about ps3 being more capable than Tegra X1. It has 4x more RAM and a GPU that would mop the floor with ps3. Its not even close. The K1 is close.
Yeah I got the K1 mixed up with the X1 somehow
Its still mobile based( not knocking just stating Anderson ) and far from these(current gen) consoles
I am saying Its not touching the PS4/XBO and instead of arguing about it.
Lets agree to disagree
Yes it is a brand new cutting edge MOBILE GPU. It's also more powerful than 10 year old console technology I don't know why it's so hard to understand that, tech advances. By that reasoning the XB1/PS4 can't possibly be 4 times more powerful than last gen cause they're running mobile class CPU'.
I find it funny that you know more about the GPU than the company that designed/manufactures it. It built on the Maxwell architecture, it's a Maxwell GPU. No one's comparing it to the desktop class Maxwell GPU, nor is anyone saying the Tegra K1 is besting current cards, nor current gen consoles. It's claiming to best pretty old tech, by only double.
No, the Tegra X1 isn't, but you do understand they are 2x more TFlops, more RAM, and GPU power in such a short time that you didn't even know there was a difference between the K1. What happens with the next 2 upgrades? I don't think ps4/xb1 have a chance, they started off too underpowered.
Last edited:
UC2 did have controller lag. I linked to it (DF showed 133ms+), and I've personally verified as much (166ms+). It's on topic, because it shows that:
1. Great gaming doesn't always depend on ultra-low-latency controller response, and most gamers for many kinds of games won't even notice controller lag for some kinds of games.
2. Sony fans (like yourself) are laughably hypocritical, and are clearly in defense mode about Nvidia's new console, which is just silly.
You mean gflops.
It needing the internet=a non threat this generation to these consoles.
Internet only is still years away from being the standard.