In the video Richard says that 10 tf on RDNA2 architecture would be double the power of Xbox One X so by my reckoning the Series X GPU is 2.4 times more powerful.
- Status
In the video Richard says that 10 tf on RDNA2 architecture would be double the power of Xbox One X so by my reckoning the Series X GPU is 2.4 times more powerful.
Yeah I don't agree with 10 but either way it's good to know that it's not only 12TF's but RDNA 2.0
Are you talking about them disputing the claim that the Xbox One X GPU was as powerful as a GTX 1070?
Last edited:
I’m not sure how he came to that number but it’s sure to be more efficient than the previous architecture. He’s estimating around a 20% performance boost.
Vega 64 (12.6 tflops of GCN) is double the power of an Xbox One X. With relatively the same performance the RX 5700 has 8 tflops of RDNA 1. If the Xbox series X really has 12 tflops of RDNA like performance it would perform better than a 2080 Super. Would be nice to have that kind of performance in a $500 console.
That would also include near perfect AI powered 4K upscaling giving developers a lot of flexibility in terms of what they used that extra power for.
On paper, the GPU in the Xbox Series X is faster than a GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Microsoft confirmed the GPU inside the Xbox Series X is based on AMD's RDNA 2 architecture with 12 TFLOPs of performance.
www.pcgamer.com
Last edited:
wait, if Sony does then I won’t be able to get the remastered edition of TLOU 2 Elle edition :’( I really wanted that backpack
Funny you would say that. A lot of PC/Tech Youtubers I subscribe to are under the impression that the Xbox Series X console will be 3x more powerful than a RX 580 (which is the PC equivalent to the Xbox One X console's GPU). That would pretty much screw everybody who bought an RTX 2xxxx or 5700 card. You'd be lucky to get even half the money you spent on those cards on eBay by this time next year.
Microsoft finally making smart moves. Hopefully the new studios deliver great games.
I mean....it was pretty obvious lol.
We seriously know nothing about RNDA 2.0, AMD has not said anything about it other than it will have hardware RT. They are basing this all off of RDNA 1.0's efficiency gains, which was has a 1.25 percent increase in IPC. We won't get a closer idea of how powerful it is until AMD releases those details, also need to know memory bandwidth numbers, CU count, and several other factors. All I know is that MS is undoubtedly sold themselves short by saying "2 times as powerful as One X" but it is obviously more powerful than just 2 times, just how much more powerful we don't know.
Anyone saying 3-5 times more powerful is just making s*** up, including the looney bins here and the tech youtubers.
Anyone saying 3-5 times more powerful is just making s*** up, including the looney bins here and the tech youtubers.
Last edited:
We need better sources.Vega 64 (12.6 tflops of GCN) is double the power of an Xbox One X. With relatively the same performance the RX 5700 has 8 tflops of RDNA 1. If the Xbox series X really has 12 tflops of RDNA like performance it would perform better than a 2080 Super. Would be nice to have that kind of performance in a $500 console.
That would also include near perfect AI powered 4K upscaling giving developers a lot of flexibility in terms of what they used that extra power for.
On paper, the GPU in the Xbox Series X is faster than a GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Microsoft confirmed the GPU inside the Xbox Series X is based on AMD's RDNA 2 architecture with 12 TFLOPs of performance.
It's most definitely at a minimum 3x...
What we don't know is exactly how much more efficient RDNA 2 is over RDNA.
More along the lines of 3X(+?) the 6TF of X=18TF.
How do you even come across those figures with only a 1.25 percent IPC increase in assuming you use RDNA1.0's IPC gains? Anything beyond that is made up BS. AMD has said nothing about RDNA2.0 architecture other than HW RT.
12 Navi TF x 1.25 would be equivalent to 13.25 GCN4.0 (polaris, which is what Xbox One X and PS4 Pro are built on) TF's.
Stop making s*** up, you're literally pulling numbers outta your ass.
"xBoX SeRiS Ex iS gOnNna Be 545 TeRaP00ps, cUz RdNa Two"
Last edited:
I’m just delighted it’s 12 tf even if it was on the old architecture. Any gains made via RDNA2 is just a bonus.
This is why I don't have any 2020 Playstation games preordered, no joke.
I'll just wait and buy the remasters on PS5 if they don't go with this direction.
It really sucks that they're keeping everyone in the dark on all things Playstation because it certainly isn't helping anyone; even legit Insiders absolutely have no clue what Sony's plan is regarding this which just sounds like it's something they're not doing.
Last edited:
MS doesn't know and the few that might in the minecraft team are probably being followed around by a Sony lawyer and a Yakuza Sniper.
well for as what he said on other things, I'm not defending him, is this one he is talking about I side with him.
Going by RDNA vs GCN is about a 45% difference in efficiency which would make about a 2.5-2.7 X jump but this is without adding the fact that it's RDNA 2.0 which we CAN assume is even more efficient than RDNA.
How much is anyones guess true but my safe guess is 3X but it could be higher,up to 5X was a bit much of jump to guess earlier but I am hopeful
Good discussion of the specs. He was also the very first person to claim 12 TF last year.
He claims the 12 TF is roughly equivalent to 15+ GCN TFs. If you want the reasoning, watch the vid.
He claims the 12 TF is roughly equivalent to 15+ GCN TFs. If you want the reasoning, watch the vid.
Last edited:
Going by RDNA vs GCN is about a 45% difference in efficiency which would make about a 2.5-2.7 X jump but this is without adding the fact that it's RDNA 2.0 which we CAN assume is even more efficient than RDNA.
How much is anyones guess true but my safe guess is 3X but it could be higher,up to 5X was a bit much of jump to guess earlier but I am hopeful
Where are you getting 45% difference in efficiency? you're absolutely delusional, and continue to make s*** up. Just stop.
- Status