Official Thread XBOX Hardware

My Current Console Is....


  • Total voters
    37
Status
Not open for further replies.
My engrish skills isn't good enough to comprehend your post.
If you use math, it adds up perfectly lol

If you knew anything about PC GPU's you would know that "2 times the GPU power" doesn't always mean double the TF's. Double the power is a very vague statement. 12 RDNA 2 TF's is more than twice the power of the Xbox One X GPU due to architectural differences and improvements in efficiency alone. They are absolutely selling themselves short by only saying twice the power due to the numbers matching up.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Dno69 and Frozpot
Really happy for MS. I'll probably stick with my PC and PS5, but I like the MS is coming hard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dno69
Really happy for MS. I'll probably stick with my PC and PS5, but I like the MS is coming hard.

MS ain't the only one after this news....

iu
 
2X the X isn't much more powerful.
2X the X RDNA 2 is about 8 (and change) TF's.
12 TF's of RDNA 2.0 is about 3-5 x the X's 6TF's.

What? What official numbers from AMD are you basing those figures on? Oh ya that's right there is no numbers on RDNA2. Stop making s*** up.
 
One of those hosts (not Richard) is the one who pushed pretty hard that the 12 TF number was not realistically possible and was really in the 8-9 range. The article mentioned that but didn’t address how the Xbox team achieved it. I have not watched the video so I’m curious if it went into more details. I recall the issue was thermals didn’t seem to work for a true 12 TF number.
 
One of those hosts (not Richard) is the one who pushed pretty hard that the 12 TF number was not realistically possible and was really in the 8-9 range. The article mentioned that but didn’t address how the Xbox team achieved it. I have not watched the video so I’m curious if it went into more details. I recall the issue was thermals didn’t seem to work for a true 12 TF number.
they said the same for XBOX ONE X and we all know what happens next
 
  • Like
Reactions: TeGu
One of those hosts (not Richard) is the one who pushed pretty hard that the 12 TF number was not realistically possible and was really in the 8-9 range. The article mentioned that but didn’t address how the Xbox team achieved it. I have not watched the video so I’m curious if it went into more details. I recall the issue was thermals didn’t seem to work for a true 12 TF number.

They pretty much would of have to achieved 12TF with a bigger Navi chip with a lower clockspeed. The rumor has been 56 CU's.
 
Last edited:
Anyone else a lil bummed, from the current stuff we know, that there may not be an it blaster on the series x?

i like being able to use my TVs remote with it and other devices
 
If you knew anything about PC GPU's you would know that "2 times the GPU power" doesn't always mean double the TF's. Double the power is a very vague statement. 12 RDNA 2 TF's is more than twice the power of the Xbox One X GPU due to architectural differences and improvements in efficiency alone. They are absolutely selling themselves short by only saying twice the power due to the numbers matching up.
And still, here were are.
 
Well, it's certainly impossible to win an argument with you, it least in your world lol
Watch that digital foundry video. They actually cover that aspect of how the power could be interpreted based on Phil's wording.
 
If I use drugs? Not really, alcohol sometimes, mostly wine with weekend dinners and maybe an avec afterwards. Not into recreational drugs, honestly haven't smoked weed the last 10 years. I don't judge though, only time I consider it bad is if health is in danger or if it's risk for addiction.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.