My engrish skills isn't good enough to comprehend your post.
If you use math, it adds up perfectly lol
I am a tech, I fix my problem.Yikes that's some dedication!
FYI Terrible customer service if you have a issue.
Really happy for MS. I'll probably stick with my PC and PS5, but I like the MS is coming hard.
2X the X isn't much more powerful.
2X the X RDNA 2 is about 8 (and change) TF's.
12 TF's of RDNA 2.0 is about 3-5 x the X's 6TF's.
Can you refute what I'm saying?What? What official numbers from AMD are you basing those figures on? Oh ya that's right there is no numbers on RDNA2. Stop making s*** up.
they said the same for XBOX ONE X and we all know what happens nextOne of those hosts (not Richard) is the one who pushed pretty hard that the 12 TF number was not realistically possible and was really in the 8-9 range. The article mentioned that but didn’t address how the Xbox team achieved it. I have not watched the video so I’m curious if it went into more details. I recall the issue was thermals didn’t seem to work for a true 12 TF number.
One of those hosts (not Richard) is the one who pushed pretty hard that the 12 TF number was not realistically possible and was really in the 8-9 range. The article mentioned that but didn’t address how the Xbox team achieved it. I have not watched the video so I’m curious if it went into more details. I recall the issue was thermals didn’t seem to work for a true 12 TF number.
And still, here were are.If you knew anything about PC GPU's you would know that "2 times the GPU power" doesn't always mean double the TF's. Double the power is a very vague statement. 12 RDNA 2 TF's is more than twice the power of the Xbox One X GPU due to architectural differences and improvements in efficiency alone. They are absolutely selling themselves short by only saying twice the power due to the numbers matching up.
Well, it's certainly impossible to win an argument with you, it least in your world lolCan you refute what I'm saying?
Watch that digital foundry video. They actually cover that aspect of how the power could be interpreted based on Phil's wording.Well, it's certainly impossible to win an argument with you, it least in your world lol
So it's 2x?Well, it's certainly impossible to win an argument with you, it least in your world lol
So Phil is clueless, got it.So it's 2x?
Anyone who says it is 2x is clueless,why it never made sense when Phil said that and is why many questioned what he meant or haven't you been paying attention?
It's much more than 2x he was being generous.
If I use drugs? Not really, alcohol sometimes, mostly wine with weekend dinners and maybe an avec afterwards. Not into recreational drugs, honestly haven't smoked weed the last 10 years. I don't judge though, only time I consider it bad is if health is in danger or if it's risk for addiction.drugs?
Wow really?So Phil is clueless, got it.