BF V went too Infantry focused.No surprise at all, the game plays great on the old maps. 64 player conquest plays so much better. I was on one of the BF3 maps I think (man that was a long time ago) where there's lots of infantry fights in the middle, and still lots of vehicles around too.
I think with V and this game they went too hard on the "everyone in vehicles" thing. BF V started it but 2042 went too hard on it. Too wide open and just assuming that everyone is going to spend the whole match in vehicles.
Hopefully the season pulls some people in. I think it will.
Go play COD.Infantry focused is my favorite way to play.
Locker and Metro ftw.
I don't like the way cod moves or it's gun playGo play COD.
Jackfrags has an in depth look at it. Definitely thin on content, but it looks like a 3 month season, so that's not too bad. There's no Halo type 6 month seasons. Season 2 supposedly coming early Sept.
Come to GamePass plz thx.
It'll be at Xbox's presser. It will either be FIFA 22 or BF 2042.I'm surprised it hasn't been announced yet. It would really generate a lot more buzz, and get people to ignore the hate and actually play the game for themselves.
They've got to know that their best chance for making money long term is getting people in and buying the season pass. People aren't going to plunk down $60+ for a new map and a couple of guns. The game is actually in a good state now with all the patches (even the BF subreddit is less salty now). They just need people to try it.
it is obvious only a skelaton crew is working on this. Obvious. s*** is taking way too long. Season 1 content is way too thin. First map rework is still months away. They dropped Hazard Zone completely.View attachment 7931
EA refutes new report claiming Battlefield 2042 development now in 'abandon ship' mode
EA has responded to new claims Battlefield 2042 has entered 'abandon ship' mode, insisting reports that only a skeleton…www.eurogamer.net
Lol. There is so much wrong with this post that can't be asked to go in to it, but......Just another company who wants a live service without the massive staff to back it up. It is no different than what's going on at 343 with Halo. Bungie is the only company still doing live service ok, and even their content is slipping badly. This entire season is a copy/paste from stuff they sunset in a past season. The amount of people working at Bungie is staggering and that's still thin on content. Halo is still doing 6 month seasons. Great gameplay, but as a live service it is a joke.
BF V had the exact same content drip. People forget a map had a crash bug in it and was delayed many months. Pacific didn't launch until more than a year after. And BF V was actually in a pretty stable state. Now the internet loves BF V for some reason which is hilarious after all the drama.
Ea/Dice would not have bothered with all the game fixes if they weren't going to jump ship. The internet wants nothing more than for EA to fail. Honestly the company should sell and rebrand at this point.
Lol. There is so much wrong with this post that can't be asked to go in to it, but......
...."Bungie is the only company still doing live service ok." Bungie have been s*** since day 1.
Of big AAA games, COD.Honest question, who is doing live service well? Anyone? I'm genuinely asking.
Of big AAA games, COD.